[PATCH] Update to Cmake for VS 2013

[Aaron Ballman]

Ping?

~Aaron

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> This seems like a better solution to me, but I'd like to hear from someone
> who actually uses floating point values in LLVM-land if they think this is
> OK.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a patch with an attempt at llvm::huge_valf (I also included
>> vald and vall for consistency).  It compiles cleanly with VS 2013,
>> though it's impossible to tell how it affects tests since there is
>> currently a miscompile that causes most of them to crash.
>>
>> ~Aaron
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There were about 15 warnings in several places from it.
>> >>
>> >> LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp
>> >> RegAllocGreedy.cpp in three places
>> >> Spiller.cpp
>> >> LiveInterval.h in two places
>> >>
>> >> If it was just in a single header file and getting tripped over on
>> >> include, I would be okay with it, but it's a bit more widely dispersed
>> >> than that.
>> >>
>> >> Alternatively, we could make an llvm::huge_valf that does suppress the
>> >> warning and gets used in place of HUGE_VALF, if that's preferable?
>> >
>> >
>> > llvm::huge_valf does sound preferable, as annoying as it is not to be
>> > able
>> > to use standard stuff from math.h.
>
>