[PATCH] Improve debug message of the layout pass.
Shankar Kalpathi Easwaran
shankarke at gmail.com
Thu Oct 17 20:28:55 PDT 2013
================
Comment at: lib/Passes/LayoutPass.cpp:40-42
@@ -30,5 +39,5 @@
/// f) Sorts atoms on how they appear within the File
-bool LayoutPass::CompareAtoms::operator()(const DefinedAtom *left,
- const DefinedAtom *right) const {
- DEBUG(llvm::dbgs() << "Sorting " << left->name() << " " << right->name() << "\n");
- if (left == right)
+bool LayoutPass::CompareAtoms::compare(
+ const DefinedAtom *left, const DefinedAtom *right, std::string &reason)
+ const {
+ if (left == right) {
----------------
Rui Ueyama wrote:
> Shankar Kalpathi Easwaran wrote:
> > Rui Ueyama wrote:
> > > Shankar Kalpathi Easwaran wrote:
> > > > Looks like the prototype became unreadable now. can we use the prototype like earlier ?
> > > This is a new function and the operator()'s prototype remains the same.
> > If the definition was like this, feel its more readable.
> >
> >
> > > bool LayoutPass::CompareAtoms::compare(const DefinedAtom *left,
> > > const DefinedAtom *right,
> > > std::string &reason) const {
> > > }
> >
> >
> > compared to the current.
> >
> > I dont want to nit pick on this, but a suggestion.
> >
> > PS : Phabricator is spoiling the indentation :)
> I didn't get that you were saying about the indentation but function prototype (parameters and types)... The indentation you wrote was exactly clang-format did, so it's already fixed.
no worries, phabricator was showing bad indentation.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1964
COMMIT
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/rL192941
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list