[llvm] r192378 - Debug Info: In DIBuilder, the context field of subprogram is updated to use

Manman Ren manman.ren at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 12:04:10 PDT 2013


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:55 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:49 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: mren
>>>> Date: Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> New Revision: 192378
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=192378&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Debug Info: In DIBuilder, the context field of subprogram is updated to
>>>> use
>>>> DIScopeRef.
>>>>
>>>> A paired commit at clang is required due to changes to DIBuilder.
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>>     llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DIBuilder.h
>>>>     llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo.h
>>>>     llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp
>>>>     llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
>>>>     llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp
>>>>     llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DebugInfo.cpp
>>>>     llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll
>>>>     llvm/trunk/tools/opt/opt.cpp
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DIBuilder.h
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DIBuilder.h?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DIBuilder.h (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DIBuilder.h Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -562,6 +562,20 @@ namespace llvm {
>>>>                                  MDNode *TParam = 0,
>>>>                                  MDNode *Decl = 0);
>>>>
>>>> +    /// FIXME: this is added for dragonegg. Once we update dragonegg
>>>> +    /// to call resolve function, this will be removed.
>>>> +    DISubprogram createFunction(DIScopeRef Scope, StringRef Name,
>>>> +                                StringRef LinkageName,
>>>> +                                DIFile File, unsigned LineNo,
>>>> +                                DICompositeType Ty, bool isLocalToUnit,
>>>> +                                bool isDefinition,
>>>> +                                unsigned ScopeLine,
>>>> +                                unsigned Flags = 0,
>>>> +                                bool isOptimized = false,
>>>> +                                Function *Fn = 0,
>>>> +                                MDNode *TParam = 0,
>>>> +                                MDNode *Decl = 0);
>>>> +
>>>>      /// createMethod - Create a new descriptor for the specified C++
>>>> method.
>>>>      /// See comments in DISubprogram for descriptions of these fields.
>>>>      /// @param Scope         Function scope.
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo.h
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo.h?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo.h (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/include/llvm/DebugInfo.h Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ class DISubprogram : public DIScope {
>>>>  public:
>>>>    explicit DISubprogram(const MDNode *N = 0) : DIScope(N) {}
>>>>
>>>> -  DIScope getContext() const { return getFieldAs<DIScope>(2); }
>>>> +  DIScopeRef getContext() const { return getFieldAs<DIScopeRef>(2); }
>>>>    StringRef getName() const { return getStringField(3); }
>>>>    StringRef getDisplayName() const { return getStringField(4); }
>>>>    StringRef getLinkageName() const { return getStringField(5); }
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfCompileUnit.cpp Thu Oct 10
>>>> 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -1300,7 +1300,7 @@ DIE *CompileUnit::getOrCreateSubprogramD
>>>>    // Construct the context before querying for the existence of the
>>>> DIE in case
>>>>    // such construction creates the DIE (as is the case for member
>>>> function
>>>>    // declarations).
>>>> -  DIE *ContextDIE = getOrCreateContextDIE(SP.getContext());
>>>> +  DIE *ContextDIE = getOrCreateContextDIE(resolve(SP.getContext()));
>>>>    if (!ContextDIE)
>>>>      ContextDIE = CUDie.get();
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp Thu Oct 10
>>>> 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -393,9 +393,10 @@ DIE *DwarfDebug::updateSubprogramScopeDI
>>>>        // function then gdb prefers the definition at top level and but
>>>> does not
>>>>        // expect specification DIE in parent function. So avoid creating
>>>>        // specification DIE for a function defined inside a function.
>>>> -      if (SP.isDefinition() && !SP.getContext().isCompileUnit() &&
>>>> -          !SP.getContext().isFile() &&
>>>> -          !isSubprogramContext(SP.getContext())) {
>>>> +      DIScope SPContext = resolve(SP.getContext());
>>>> +      if (SP.isDefinition() && !SPContext.isCompileUnit() &&
>>>> +          !SPContext.isFile() &&
>>>> +          !isSubprogramContext(SPContext)) {
>>>>          SPCU->addFlag(SPDie, dwarf::DW_AT_declaration);
>>>>
>>>>          // Add arguments.
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DIBuilder.cpp Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -1041,6 +1041,28 @@ DIVariable DIBuilder::createComplexVaria
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  /// createFunction - Create a new descriptor for the specified
>>>> function.
>>>> +/// FIXME: this is added for dragonegg. Once we update dragonegg
>>>> +/// to call resolve function, this will be removed.
>>>> +DISubprogram DIBuilder::createFunction(DIScopeRef Context,
>>>> +                                       StringRef Name,
>>>> +                                       StringRef LinkageName,
>>>> +                                       DIFile File, unsigned LineNo,
>>>> +                                       DICompositeType Ty,
>>>> +                                       bool isLocalToUnit, bool
>>>> isDefinition,
>>>> +                                       unsigned ScopeLine,
>>>> +                                       unsigned Flags, bool
>>>> isOptimized,
>>>> +                                       Function *Fn,
>>>> +                                       MDNode *TParams,
>>>> +                                       MDNode *Decl) {
>>>> +  // dragonegg does not generate identifier for types, so using an
>>>> empty map
>>>> +  // to resolve the context should be fine.
>>>> +  DITypeIdentifierMap EmptyMap;
>>>> +  return createFunction(Context.resolve(EmptyMap), Name, LinkageName,
>>>> File,
>>>> +                        LineNo, Ty, isLocalToUnit, isDefinition,
>>>> ScopeLine,
>>>> +                        Flags, isOptimized, Fn, TParams, Decl);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/// createFunction - Create a new descriptor for the specified
>>>> function.
>>>>  DISubprogram DIBuilder::createFunction(DIDescriptor Context,
>>>>                                         StringRef Name,
>>>>                                         StringRef LinkageName,
>>>> @@ -1058,7 +1080,7 @@ DISubprogram DIBuilder::createFunction(D
>>>>    Value *Elts[] = {
>>>>      GetTagConstant(VMContext, dwarf::DW_TAG_subprogram),
>>>>      File.getFileNode(),
>>>> -    getNonCompileUnitScope(Context),
>>>> +    DIScope(getNonCompileUnitScope(Context)).getRef(),
>>>>      MDString::get(VMContext, Name),
>>>>      MDString::get(VMContext, Name),
>>>>      MDString::get(VMContext, LinkageName),
>>>> @@ -1107,7 +1129,7 @@ DISubprogram DIBuilder::createMethod(DID
>>>>    Value *Elts[] = {
>>>>      GetTagConstant(VMContext, dwarf::DW_TAG_subprogram),
>>>>      F.getFileNode(),
>>>> -    getNonCompileUnitScope(Context),
>>>> +    DIScope(getNonCompileUnitScope(Context)).getRef(),
>>>>      MDString::get(VMContext, Name),
>>>>      MDString::get(VMContext, Name),
>>>>      MDString::get(VMContext, LinkageName),
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DebugInfo.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DebugInfo.cpp?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DebugInfo.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/IR/DebugInfo.cpp Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -511,8 +511,8 @@ bool DISubprogram::Verify() const {
>>>>    if (!isSubprogram())
>>>>      return false;
>>>>
>>>> -  // Make sure context @ field 2 and type @ field 7 are MDNodes.
>>>> -  if (!fieldIsMDNode(DbgNode, 2))
>>>> +  // Make sure context @ field 2 is a ScopeRef and type @ field 7 is a
>>>> MDNode.
>>>> +  if (!fieldIsScopeRef(DbgNode, 2))
>>>>      return false;
>>>>    if (!fieldIsMDNode(DbgNode, 7))
>>>>      return false;
>>>> @@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ void DebugInfoFinder::processLexicalBloc
>>>>  void DebugInfoFinder::processSubprogram(DISubprogram SP) {
>>>>    if (!addSubprogram(SP))
>>>>      return;
>>>> -  processScope(SP.getContext());
>>>> +  processScope(SP.getContext().resolve(TypeIdentifierMap));
>>>>    processType(SP.getType());
>>>>    DIArray TParams = SP.getTemplateParams();
>>>>    for (unsigned I = 0, E = TParams.getNumElements(); I != E; ++I) {
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -6,9 +6,16 @@
>>>>  ; Make sure we correctly handle containing type of a struct being a
>>>> type identifier.
>>>>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_containing_type [DW_FORM_ref4]       (cu + {{.*}}
>>>> => {[[TYPE]]})
>>>>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "C")
>>>> +
>>>> +; Make sure we correctly handle context of a subprogram being a type
>>>> identifier.
>>>>  ; CHECK: [[SP:.*]]: DW_TAG_subprogram
>>>> +; CHECK: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "foo")
>>>>  ; Make sure we correctly handle containing type of a subprogram being
>>>> a type identifier.
>>>>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_containing_type [DW_FORM_ref4]       (cu + {{.*}} =>
>>>> {[[TYPE]]})
>>>> +; CHECK: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
>>>> +; CHECK: NULL
>>>> +; CHECK: NULL
>>>> +
>>>>  ; CHECK: [[TYPE2:.*]]: DW_TAG_structure_type
>>>>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_structure_type
>>>>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "D")
>>>> @@ -128,7 +135,7 @@ attributes #1 = { nounwind readnone }
>>>>  !10 = metadata !{i32 786453, i32 0, null, metadata !"", i32 0, i64 0,
>>>> i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, null, metadata !11, i32 0, null, null, null} ; [
>>>> DW_TAG_subroutine_type ] [line 0, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>>>  !11 = metadata !{metadata !12}
>>>>  !12 = metadata !{i32 786468, null, null, metadata !"int", i32 0, i64
>>>> 32, i64 32, i64 0, i32 0, i32 5} ; [ DW_TAG_base_type ] [int] [line 0, size
>>>> 32, align 32, offset 0, enc DW_ATE_signed]
>>>> -!13 = metadata !{i32 786478, metadata !1, metadata !4, metadata
>>>> !"foo", metadata !"foo", metadata !"_ZN1C3fooEv", i32 2, metadata !14, i1
>>>> false, i1 false, i32 1, i32 0, metadata !"_ZTS1C", i32 256, i1 false, null,
>>>> null, i32 0, metadata !17, i32 2} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 2] [foo]
>>>> +!13 = metadata !{i32 786478, metadata !1, metadata !"_ZTS1C", metadata
>>>> !"foo", metadata !"foo", metadata !"_ZN1C3fooEv", i32 2, metadata !14, i1
>>>> false, i1 false, i32 1, i32 0, metadata !"_ZTS1C", i32 256, i1 false, null,
>>>> null, i32 0, metadata !17, i32 2} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 2] [foo]
>>>>  !14 = metadata !{i32 786453, i32 0, null, metadata !"", i32 0, i64 0,
>>>> i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, null, metadata !15, i32 0, null, null, null} ; [
>>>> DW_TAG_subroutine_type ] [line 0, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>>>  !15 = metadata !{null, metadata !16}
>>>>  !16 = metadata !{i32 786447, null, null, metadata !"", i32 0, i64 64,
>>>> i64 64, i64 0, i32 1088, metadata !"_ZTS1C"} ; [ DW_TAG_pointer_type ]
>>>> [line 0, size 64, align 64, offset 0] [artificial] [from _ZTS1C]
>>>>
>>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/tools/opt/opt.cpp
>>>> URL:
>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/tools/opt/opt.cpp?rev=192378&r1=192377&r2=192378&view=diff
>>>>
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- llvm/trunk/tools/opt/opt.cpp (original)
>>>> +++ llvm/trunk/tools/opt/opt.cpp Thu Oct 10 13:40:01 2013
>>>> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ struct BreakpointPrinter : public Module
>>>>            "A MDNode in llvm.dbg.sp should be null or a DISubprogram.");
>>>>          if (!SP)
>>>>            continue;
>>>> -        getContextName(SP.getContext(), Name);
>>>> +        getContextName(SP.getContext().resolve(TypeIdentifierMap),
>>>> Name);
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there test coverage for this?
>>>
>>
>> As long as there existed testing cases for the BreakpointPrinter, this
>> change should be tested.
>> I assumed we had test coverage for the BreakpointPrinter, but it seems
>> that we don't by "grep -r print-breakpoints-for-testing".
>>
>
> Put simply, if I remove this line of code, does anything fail? If not,
> it'd be nice if you could add some coverage. Not strictly necessary, the
> API change is simple and mechanical, etc.
>
Yes, the compilation will fail :)
I will add a testing case to test the BreakpointPrinter.

Manman
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131011/0bf15dae/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list