[llvm] r192376 - Add comments to debug info testing case.

[Eric Christopher]

Comments aren't what I meant. I meant to check in the test case that the
particular structure you're checking is the one you expect. Particular
advice would be to check the name of the variable or type.
On Oct 10, 2013 11:18 AM, "Manman Ren" <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:

> Author: mren
> Date: Thu Oct 10 13:13:17 2013
> New Revision: 192376
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=192376&view=rev
> Log:
> Add comments to debug info testing case.
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll
> URL:
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll?rev=192376&r1=192375&r2=192376&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/test/DebugInfo/tu-composite.ll Thu Oct 10 13:13:17 2013
> @@ -3,14 +3,18 @@
>  ; RUN: llc -filetype=obj -O0 < %s > %t
>  ; RUN: llvm-dwarfdump -debug-dump=info %t | FileCheck %s
>  ; CHECK: [[TYPE:.*]]: DW_TAG_structure_type
> +; Make sure we correctly handle containing type of a struct being a type
> identifier.
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_containing_type [DW_FORM_ref4]       (cu + {{.*}} =>
> {[[TYPE]]})
> +; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "C")
>  ; CHECK: [[SP:.*]]: DW_TAG_subprogram
> +; Make sure we correctly handle containing type of a subprogram being a
> type identifier.
>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_containing_type [DW_FORM_ref4]       (cu + {{.*}} =>
> {[[TYPE]]})
>  ; CHECK: [[TYPE2:.*]]: DW_TAG_structure_type
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_structure_type
>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "D")
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_member
>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "a")
> +; Make sure we correctly handle context of a struct being a type
> identifier.
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_structure_type
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "Nested")
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_structure_type
> @@ -18,17 +22,21 @@
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_declaration [DW_FORM_flag]      (0x01)
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_structure_type
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "virt<bar>")
> +; Make sure we correctly handle type of a template_type being a type
> identifier.
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_template_type_parameter
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + {{.*}} => {[[TYPE2]]})
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "T")
> +; Make sure we correctly handle derived-from of a typedef being a type
> identifier.
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_typedef
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + {{.*}} => {[[TYPE2]]})
>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "baz2")
> +; Make sure we correctly handle derived-from of a pointer type being a
> type identifier.
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_pointer_type
>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + {{.*}} => {[[TYPE]]})
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_typedef
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + {{.*}} => {[[TYPE2]]})
>  ; CHECK: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] {{.*}}= "baz")
> +; Make sure we correctly handle derived-from of an array type being a
> type identifier.
>  ; CHECK: DW_TAG_array_type
>  ; CHECK-NEXT: DW_AT_type [DW_FORM_ref4] (cu + {{.*}} => {[[TYPE2]]})
>  ; IR generated from clang -g with the following source:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20131010/a0224e64/attachment.html>