Suggesting elimination of unused Target implementation members

[Rafael Espíndola]

Committed as r192099. Thanks again!

On 6 October 2013 13:36, MathOnNapkins . <mathonnapkins at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to clarify, no I don't have commit access. And not all targets kept
> this vestigial reference to a dead portion of the interface, these are the
> stragglers really.
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Rafael Espíndola
> <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> it looks like this is dead since r34492!
>>
>> On 6 October 2013 10:34, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > LGTM!
>> >
>> > Thanks. Do you have commit access?
>> >
>> > On 5 October 2013 16:24, MathOnNapkins . <mathonnapkins at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Dear All,
>> >>
>> >> While researching the existing targets I noticed that
>> >> getEHExceptionRegister() and getEHHandlerRegister() are not called
>> >> anywhere
>> >> in the source tree (presumably used to be defined in
>> >> TargetRegisterInfo.h as
>> >> a pure virtual?) Several targets still implement and declare member
>> >> functions with these names, and only one of them (PowerPC) does
>> >> anything
>> >> meaningful. So, unless they're being kept around for posterity or
>> >> future
>> >> use, I would venture to say that they're just taking up space. I've
>> >> included
>> >> a patch that removes them.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for reading,
>> >> ~MoN / Dave
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> llvm-commits mailing list
>> >> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> >>
>
>