Patch to BitcodeReader
Joe Abbey
joe.abbey at gmail.com
Thu Sep 12 14:49:36 PDT 2013
Sure Tom I can commit this for you.
Joe
On Sep 12, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Tom Roeder <tmroeder at google.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I don't have commit access; could one of you please commit for me?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Joe Abbey <joe.abbey at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tom,
>
> This all looks good please review my updates to your patch for LLVM coding style.
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2013, at 5:10 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>
> > On 09/12/2013 11:03 PM, Tom Roeder wrote:
> >> Here's a version with a comment and the fixed CHECK statement.
> >
> > Nice.
> >
> > Just a tiny comment I overlooked before:
> >
> >> Index: lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
> >> ===================================================================
> >> --- lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp (revision 190562)
> >> +++ lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp (working copy)
> >> @@ -1389,11 +1389,23 @@
> >> }
> >> case bitc::CST_CODE_CE_SELECT: // CE_SELECT: [opval#, opval#, opval#]
> >> if (Record.size() < 3) return Error("Invalid CE_SELECT record");
> >> - V = ConstantExpr::getSelect(
> >> - ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[0],
> >> - Type::getInt1Ty(Context)),
> >> - ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[1],CurTy),
> >> - ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[2],CurTy));
> >> +
> >> + // If CurTy is a vector of length n, then Record[0] must be a <n x i1>
> >> + // vector. Otherwise, it must be a single bit.
> >> + if (VectorType *VTy = dyn_cast<VectorType>(CurTy)) {
> >> + unsigned int EltCount = VTy->getNumElements();
> >> + Type *SelectorTy = VectorType::get(Type::getInt1Ty(Context), EltCount);
> >> +
> >> + V = ConstantExpr::getSelect(ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[0],
> >> + SelectorTy),
> >> + ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[1],CurTy),
> >> + ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[2],CurTy));
> >> + } else {
> >> + V = ConstantExpr::getSelect(ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[0],
> >> + Type::getInt1Ty(Context)),
> >> + ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[1],CurTy),
> >> + ValueList.getConstantFwdRef(Record[2],CurTy));
> >
> > ^^ Those lines are not properly
> > aligned.
> >
> > Otherwise, the patch looks good. Can you commit this patch yourself or do you need me to commit it?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tobias
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130912/114c8d3f/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list