[llvm] r189297 - Add new API lto_codegen_compile_parallel().

Bob Wilson bob.wilson at apple.com
Tue Aug 27 09:09:31 PDT 2013


On Aug 27, 2013, at 12:27 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Better yet, could we have that discussion before growing the set of stable APIs that we claim to never regress?
> 
> Sure. Sorry about that. I actually don't what to touch the lto_xxx() API for now.  I just want to do some workaround 
> on the limitation on the linker, and wait for new ld. But Bob didn't buy my argument:-).

I am not so much attached to this particular approach as I am opposed to the workarounds that you had previously proposed.  And, regardless, Chandler is absolutely right that any change to the libLTO interface needs to be thoroughly reviewed and discussed on the mailing list before it gets committed.



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list