[PATCH] Add support for ARM modified immediate syntax
JF Bastien
jfb at google.com
Thu Aug 1 09:39:17 PDT 2013
> 1. whether this support should be implemented in the first place
> 2. the exact manner of implementation
>
> I understand there are objections to 2. It is not clear whether there
> are any objections to 1.
I agree with 1.: supporting ARM's specification for assembly is
desirable, and if you're willing to do it then I think you should be
encouraged to do so.
I have no opinion on 2., since I don't have enough experience with the
code base.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list