[PATCH] Refactor sameNoopInput (determining tail-call legitimacy)

[Stephen Lin]

> You know, I don't disagree that this is the probably the saner and
> more developer-friendly call to make, but if you think about it,
> generating a tail call is not (as far as I can tell) the incorrect
> thing to do here from a C language perspective, because once you pass
> an undefined value as a parameter for a call that you're executing
> you've entered full-on undefined behavior territory (correct me if I'm
> wrong?)

Ahh, perhaps I'm wrong about this actually :) My mistake. Reading up
on standards docs...

(Learn something new every day...)

Stephen