[patch] simplifyCFG for review

[Ye, Mei]

It also depends on review turn-around time.  I have to say that the review process is not clearly defined here.  And it is the most lengthy review compared to other open sources.

-Mei

From: Chandler Carruth [mailto:chandlerc at google.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 5:26 PM
To: Ye, Mei
Cc: Andrew Trick; Matt Arsenault; Evan Cheng; llvm commits; Koenig, Christian
Subject: Re: [patch] simplifyCFG for review


On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Ye, Mei <Mei.Ye at amd.com<mailto:Mei.Ye at amd.com>> wrote:
I will re-factor the code following your suggestion.  If the check-in process can’t be finished next week,  please allow some delay since my sabbatical is coming.

FWIW, if you can't finish the refactoring in a reasonably short period of time, it might be more appropriate to pull this out and refactor it locally when you have time, and resubmit it.

Note, I don't have a problem with refactoring it in-tree, just don't want you to feel pressured to finish it in a short timeframe, and don't want others to be confused by the half-refactored state of things over a long period of time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130729/bd483d2b/attachment.html>