[PATCH] Add CHECK-LABEL directive to FileCheck to allow more accurate error messages and error recovery
Stephen Lin
swlin at post.harvard.edu
Thu Jul 11 13:42:23 PDT 2013
> I explained my preference, and LABEL suggests something that is not
> necessarily true - since it doesn't have to be attached to a label. Your
> documentation and patch description speaks about "breaking to blocks", which
> has the spatial semantics I was referring to earlier and no relation to
> labels (which are just one example of unique identifiers that may serve as
> block boundaries).
>
> That said, there's only a certain amount of time I'm willing to spend on
> such bikeshedding - so if I'm in minority w.r.t the name, so be it.
>
> Eli
No worries, I see your point and I'm in no rush so I'll see if someone
comes up with another suggestion.
Stephen
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list