[llvm] r185505 - Use SmallVectorImpl& instead of SmallVector& to avoid needlessly respecifying the small vector size.
Eric Christopher
echristo at gmail.com
Tue Jul 2 21:38:12 PDT 2013
Heh. After your commits I just did the grep myself.
Crazy.
-eric
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just spotted the one place in your commit and started grepping. Looks like
> there are a lot of cases like this out there.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> And again. Was just reorganizing and didn't think about that part. :)
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2013 9:27 PM, "Craig Topper" <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: ctopper
>>> Date: Tue Jul 2 23:24:43 2013
>>> New Revision: 185505
>>>
>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=185505&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Use SmallVectorImpl& instead of SmallVector& to avoid needlessly
>>> respecifying the small vector size.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
>>>
>>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp
>>> URL:
>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp?rev=185505&r1=185504&r2=185505&view=diff
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp (original)
>>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.cpp Tue Jul 2 23:24:43
>>> 2013
>>> @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ DIE *DwarfDebug::constructLexicalScopeDI
>>> if (Scope->isAbstractScope())
>>> return ScopeDIE;
>>>
>>> - const SmallVector<InsnRange, 4> &Ranges = Scope->getRanges();
>>> + const SmallVectorImpl<InsnRange> &Ranges = Scope->getRanges();
>>> if (Ranges.empty())
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ DIE *DwarfDebug::constructLexicalScopeDI
>>> // represent this concrete inlined copy of the function.
>>> DIE *DwarfDebug::constructInlinedScopeDIE(CompileUnit *TheCU,
>>> LexicalScope *Scope) {
>>> - const SmallVector<InsnRange, 4> &Ranges = Scope->getRanges();
>>> + const SmallVectorImpl<InsnRange> &Ranges = Scope->getRanges();
>>> assert(Ranges.empty() == false &&
>>> "LexicalScope does not have instruction markers!");
>>>
>>> @@ -589,14 +589,14 @@ DIE *DwarfDebug::constructScopeDIE(Compi
>>> }
>>>
>>> // Collect lexical scope children first.
>>> - const SmallVector<DbgVariable *, 8> &Variables =
>>> ScopeVariables.lookup(Scope);
>>> + const SmallVectorImpl<DbgVariable *> &Variables
>>> =ScopeVariables.lookup(Scope);
>>> for (unsigned i = 0, N = Variables.size(); i < N; ++i)
>>> if (DIE *Variable =
>>> TheCU->constructVariableDIE(Variables[i],
>>> Scope->isAbstractScope())) {
>>> Children.push_back(Variable);
>>> if (Variables[i]->isObjectPointer()) ObjectPointer = Variable;
>>> }
>>> - const SmallVector<LexicalScope *, 4> &Scopes = Scope->getChildren();
>>> + const SmallVectorImpl<LexicalScope *> &Scopes = Scope->getChildren();
>>> for (unsigned j = 0, M = Scopes.size(); j < M; ++j)
>>> if (DIE *Nested = constructScopeDIE(TheCU, Scopes[j]))
>>> Children.push_back(Nested);
>>> @@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ void DwarfDebug::identifyScopeMarkers()
>>> while (!WorkList.empty()) {
>>> LexicalScope *S = WorkList.pop_back_val();
>>>
>>> - const SmallVector<LexicalScope *, 4> &Children = S->getChildren();
>>> + const SmallVectorImpl<LexicalScope *> &Children = S->getChildren();
>>> if (!Children.empty())
>>> for (SmallVectorImpl<LexicalScope *>::const_iterator SI =
>>> Children.begin(),
>>> SE = Children.end(); SI != SE; ++SI)
>>> @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ void DwarfDebug::identifyScopeMarkers()
>>> if (S->isAbstractScope())
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> - const SmallVector<InsnRange, 4> &Ranges = S->getRanges();
>>> + const SmallVectorImpl<InsnRange> &Ranges = S->getRanges();
>>> if (Ranges.empty())
>>> continue;
>>> for (SmallVectorImpl<InsnRange>::const_iterator RI = Ranges.begin(),
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
>
>
> --
> ~Craig
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list