[polly] r185254 - TempScop: (Partial) Implement the printDetail function.
Tobias Grosser
tobias at grosser.es
Tue Jul 2 09:21:54 PDT 2013
On 06/29/2013 12:00 AM, Hongbin Zheng wrote:
> Author: ether
> Date: Sat Jun 29 02:00:14 2013
> New Revision: 185254
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=185254&view=rev
> Log:
> TempScop: (Partial) Implement the printDetail function.
Thanks!
Also, it would be nice to check the changes with clang-format before you
commit them.
If clang-format is in your path, you can just run 'make
polly-check-format' (or 'make polly-update-format' to fix the formatting)
Some comments inline.
Cheers
Tobias
> void TempScop::printDetail(raw_ostream &OS, ScalarEvolution *SE,
> LoopInfo *LI, const Region *CurR,
> - unsigned ind) const {}
> + unsigned ind) const {
> +
> + // FIXME: Print other details rather than memory accesses.
> + typedef Region::const_block_iterator bb_iterator;
> + for (bb_iterator I = CurR->block_begin(), E = CurR->block_end(); I != E; ++I){
> + BasicBlock *CurBlock = *I;
> +
> + AccFuncMapType::const_iterator AccSetIt = AccFuncMap.find(CurBlock);
> +
> + // Ignore trivial blocks that do not contain any memory access.
> + if (AccSetIt == AccFuncMap.end()) continue;
It would be nice to move this into a separate function that is also used
in place of the Scop::isTrivialBB() function in ScopInfo.cpp.
Such a patch is approved for commit. ;-)
> void TempScopInfo::buildScalarDependences(Instruction *Inst, Region *R) {
> // No need to translate these scalar dependences into polyhedral form, because
>
> Added: polly/trunk/test/TempScop/tempscop-printing.ll
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/polly/trunk/test/TempScop/tempscop-printing.ll?rev=185254&view=auto
> ==============================================================================
> --- polly/trunk/test/TempScop/tempscop-printing.ll (added)
> +++ polly/trunk/test/TempScop/tempscop-printing.ll Sat Jun 29 02:00:14 2013
> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> +; RUN: opt %loadPolly -basicaa -polly-analyze-ir -analyze < %s | FileCheck %s
It would be nice to run this also with -polly-codegen-scev enabled.
> +
> +; void f(long A[], int N, int *init_ptr) {
> +; long i, j;
> +;
> +; for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
> +; init = *init_ptr;
> +; for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) {
> +; A[i] = init + 2;
> +; }
> +; }
> +; }
> +
> +target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128"
> +target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
> +
> +define void @f(i64* noalias %A, i64 %N, i64* noalias %init_ptr) nounwind {
> +entry:
> + br label %for.i
> +
> +for.i:
> + %indvar.i = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %indvar.i.next, %for.i.end ]
> + %indvar.i.next = add nsw i64 %indvar.i, 1
> + br label %entry.next
> +
> +entry.next:
> +; CHECK: BB: entry.next
> + %init = load i64* %init_ptr
> +; CHECK: Read init_ptr[0]
> +; CHECK: Write init.s2a[0]
> + br label %for.j
> +
> +for.j:
> + %indvar.j = phi i64 [ 0, %entry.next ], [ %indvar.j.next, %for.j ]
> +; CHECK: BB: for.j
> +; CHECK: Read init.s2a[0]
> +; CHECK: Write A[{0,+,8}<%for.j>]
> + %init_plus_two = add i64 %init, 2
> + %scevgep = getelementptr i64* %A, i64 %indvar.j
> + store i64 %init_plus_two, i64* %scevgep
> + %indvar.j.next = add nsw i64 %indvar.j, 1
> + %exitcond.j = icmp eq i64 %indvar.j.next, %N
> + br i1 %exitcond.j, label %for.i.end, label %for.j
> +
> +for.i.end:
> + %exitcond.i = icmp eq i64 %indvar.i.next, %N
> + br i1 %exitcond.i, label %return, label %for.i
> +
> +return:
> + ret void
> +}
Overall a very nice well targeted test case!
Thanks,
Tobi
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list