[llvm] r184239 - We want a string representation of the attribute, not the kind as a string.
David Blaikie
dblaikie at gmail.com
Tue Jun 18 15:43:28 PDT 2013
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 18, 2013, at 2:39 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 18, 2013, at 2:35 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Author: void
>>>> Date: Tue Jun 18 16:27:00 2013
>>>> New Revision: 184239
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=184239&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> We want a string representation of the attribute, not the kind as a string.
>>>
>>> Test case? (do we have test cases for the verifier?)
>>>
>> I'll cobble one together.
>>
> I don't think I can. This requires that the .bc file be malformed. So the `llvm-as' will reject it before it gets to the code I just fixed...
Can we remove this as dead code then? (replace it with an assert)
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list