[patch] DAG nodes IR ordering code re-factoring

Guo, Xiaoyi Xiaoyi.Guo at amd.com
Tue May 21 11:43:45 PDT 2013


Hi Tom,

Here's the email thread where I explained my motivation and responses from other people.
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-April/061728.html

I will make sure there are no regressions on R600.

Thanks,
Xiaoyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Stellard [mailto:tom at stellard.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:24 AM
To: Guo, Xiaoyi
Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Stellard, Thomas
Subject: Re: [patch] DAG nodes IR ordering code re-factoring

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:46:13AM +0000, Guo, Xiaoyi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please find attached a set of patches that does re-factoring of DAG node IR ordering by using a field in the DAG node object to track it IR ordering.
>

Hi Xiaoyi,

Can you explain why you want to refactor DAG node IR ordering?  I'm not objecting, I'm just curious.

Also, could you update the R600 target and make sure there are no regressions.  You can build R600 by using the
--enable-experimental-targets=R600 configure option.

Thanks,
Tom

> Please help to review them and if okay commit them.
> 
> Your help is appreciated.
> 
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyi
> 





> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits







More information about the llvm-commits mailing list