[PATCH] docs: Clarify how basic blocks without named label are handled.

[Sean Silva]

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:

>
> On May 17, 2013, at 10:11 AM, Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Describe that basic blocks without named labels are assigned numbered
> > label using the same counter as for unnamed temporaries.
> >
> > Based on http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16043 and llvm-dev
> > discussion.
>
> LGTM.
>
>
Cool.

Paul, do you need me to commit this for you?

-- Sean Silva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130517/9617e913/attachment.html>