[PATCH] MemoryDependenceAnalysis always depends on DominatorTree

Nick Lewycky nicholas at mxc.ca
Sun May 5 16:42:07 PDT 2013


Matt Arsenault wrote:
>
>    Is this acceptable now? None of the tests I've tried fail (though that was true in previous versions as well...)
>
> http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D583

Looks good, please commit. Thanks for the fix!

Nick



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list