[llvm] r180140 - Make sure the instruction right after an inlined function has a

Adrian Prantl aprantl at apple.com
Wed Apr 24 11:33:25 PDT 2013


On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:

> 
> On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Adrian Prantl wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Apr 23, 2013, at 3:44 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:56 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:
>>>> Author: adrian
>>>> Date: Tue Apr 23 14:56:03 2013
>>>> New Revision: 180140
>>>> 
>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=180140&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> Make sure the instruction right after an inlined function has a
>>>> debug location. This solves a problem where range of an inlined
>>>> subroutine is emitted wrongly.
>>>> Patch by Manman Ren.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Manman has commit rights. Why is she not committing this?
>> I inherited the radar from her, she already had this patch, but it was depending on some other issue to be fixed first. So when that issue was fixed I went ahead and committed it, without taking credit for it, but with taking full responsibility for it :-)
> 
> Adrian,
> 
> Thanks for taking responsibility for it :)
> The problem was reported on a larger testing case and I came up with this small testing case to verify the patch.
> Can you check whether the patch has an impact on the actual testing case?
> I think I checked it before, but not so sure.

Yes it does, but Eric correctly pointed out that the current testcase doesn’t actually show any change in the range of the inlined_subroutine DIE. I’m currently running delta on the IR code of the original test and will commit a reduced example that actually tests for the inlined_subroutine range once that’s done.

cheers,
Adrian



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list