R600 Patches (Plus one for SI): Various fixes to get the piglit all_cl tests to stop hanging
Vincent Lejeune
vljn at ovi.com
Mon Apr 22 14:28:44 PDT 2013
Hi,
Some of our passes use the AMDGPU::RETURN instruction (off hand I remember one case in InstructionEmitter).
Beside I need to postprocess the return instruction to add PAD.
Vincent
----- Mail original -----
> De : Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>
> À : Vincent Lejeune <vljn at ovi.com>
> Cc : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>; "llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu" <llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi 19 avril 2013 0h17
> Objet : Re: R600 Patches (Plus one for SI): Various fixes to get the piglit
all_cl tests to stop hanging
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 06:47:49AM -0700, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>> I modified your patch adding the isFetch bit, and I have another one that
> could be used instead of the NOP patch.
>>
>
> I can't get my mail client to inline your NOP patch, but I have two
> comments:
>
> 1. I think you should rename NOP_eg and NOP_r600 to CF_END_eg and
> CF_END_r600 and also rename CF_END to CF_END_cm. On pre-cayman, a NOP
> with the EOP bit is essentially the same as a CF_END, so I think it
> would be good to use consistent naming. Also, it would be a good idea
> to add an EOP target flag to these instructions.
>
> 2. You may be able to match the IL_retflag node and generate a CF_END_*
> instruction directly from the instruction selector instead of lowering
> the return later on.
>
> -Tom
>
>> With them, I can emit native VTX/TEX clauses which should solve the bug
> with MaxFetchInst with no regression,
>> but I still need to work things to have prettier asm output and also fix
> lit test.
>>
>> Vincent
>>
>>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>> > De : Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net>
>> > À : Alex Deucher <alexdeucher at gmail.com>
>> > Cc : llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > Envoyé le : Vendredi 12 avril 2013 23h25
>> > Objet : Re: R600 Patches (Plus one for SI): Various fixes to get the
> piglit
>> all_cl tests to stop hanging
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 05:11:25PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Tom Stellard
> <tom at stellard.net>
>> > wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Attached are several patches to get the piglit test suite to
> complete
>> > a
>> >> > full run with all_cl.tests without locking up on my Juniper.
>> >> >
>> >> > Please Review.
>> >>
>> >> > From ca217819c518e4de2f2dcc3e9044ccb2375b1474 Mon Sep 17
> 00:00:00 2001
>> >> > From: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>
>> >> > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:53:58 -0400
>> >> > Subject: [PATCH 4/8] R600: Emit RETURN instructions as a NOP
> with End
>> > of Program bit set
>> >>
>> >> Will this cause problems on vliw4 (cayman/tn) hardware?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yes, I forgot about this. I will fix it.
>> >
>> >> > From c0cb56a4e2bb43e0caaf0b6c080b72a34bc4a075 Mon Sep 17
> 00:00:00 2001
>> >> > From: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>
>> >> > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:55:16 -0400
>> >> > Subject: [PATCH 5/8] R600: limit vtx clauses to one
> instructions
>> >> >
>> >> > This fixes incorrect address calculations when multiple vtx
>> > instructions
>> >> > are in the same clause.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe add a comment with the actual hw limits so this doesn't
> cause
>> >> confusion if we fix it down the road?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Sure.
>> >
>> > -Tom
>> >
>> >> Alex
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > llvm-commits mailing list
>> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-R600-Add-CF_END.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 8523 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130422/67d6e841/attachment.obj>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list