[llvm] r179452 - MI-Sched: DEBUG formatting.
Andrew Trick
atrick at apple.com
Fri Apr 12 23:07:49 PDT 2013
Author: atrick
Date: Sat Apr 13 01:07:49 2013
New Revision: 179452
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=179452&view=rev
Log:
MI-Sched: DEBUG formatting.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp?rev=179452&r1=179451&r2=179452&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/MachineScheduler.cpp Sat Apr 13 01:07:49 2013
@@ -1343,6 +1343,8 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::SchedBoundary:
for (ReadyQueue::iterator I = Available.begin(), E = Available.end();
I != E; ++I) {
unsigned L = getUnscheduledLatency(*I);
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << Available.getName()
+ << " RemLatency SU(" << (*I)->NodeNum << ") " << L << '\n');
if (L > RemLatency)
RemLatency = L;
}
@@ -1353,10 +1355,13 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::SchedBoundary:
RemLatency = L;
}
unsigned CriticalPathLimit = Rem->CriticalPath + SchedModel->getILPWindow();
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << Available.getName()
+ << " ExpectedLatency " << ExpectedLatency
+ << " CP Limit " << CriticalPathLimit << '\n');
if (RemLatency + ExpectedLatency >= CriticalPathLimit
&& RemLatency > Rem->getMaxRemainingCount(SchedModel)) {
Policy.ReduceLatency = true;
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Increase ILP: " << Available.getName() << '\n');
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " Increase ILP: " << Available.getName() << '\n');
}
}
@@ -1573,7 +1578,8 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::balanceZones(
if ((int)(Rem->getMaxRemainingCount(SchedModel) - RemainingCritCount)
> (int)SchedModel->getLatencyFactor()) {
CriticalCand.Policy.ReduceResIdx = CriticalZone.CritResIdx;
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Balance " << CriticalZone.Available.getName() << " reduce "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " Balance " << CriticalZone.Available.getName()
+ << " reduce "
<< SchedModel->getProcResource(CriticalZone.CritResIdx)->Name
<< '\n');
}
@@ -1584,7 +1590,8 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::balanceZones(
if ((int)(OppositeZone.ExpectedCount - OppositeCount)
> (int)SchedModel->getLatencyFactor()) {
OppositeCand.Policy.DemandResIdx = CriticalZone.CritResIdx;
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Balance " << OppositeZone.Available.getName() << " demand "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " Balance " << OppositeZone.Available.getName()
+ << " demand "
<< SchedModel->getProcResource(OppositeZone.CritResIdx)->Name
<< '\n');
}
@@ -1608,7 +1615,7 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::checkResourceL
if (Top.CritResIdx != Rem.CritResIdx) {
TopCand.Policy.ReduceResIdx = Top.CritResIdx;
BotCand.Policy.ReduceResIdx = Bot.CritResIdx;
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Reduce scheduled "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " Reduce scheduled "
<< SchedModel->getProcResource(Top.CritResIdx)->Name << '\n');
}
return;
@@ -1625,7 +1632,7 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::checkResourceL
&& (Rem.CriticalPath > Top.CurrCycle + Bot.CurrCycle)) {
TopCand.Policy.ReduceLatency = true;
BotCand.Policy.ReduceLatency = true;
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Reduce scheduled latency " << Top.ExpectedLatency
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " Reduce scheduled latency " << Top.ExpectedLatency
<< " + " << Bot.ExpectedLatency << '\n');
}
return;
@@ -1863,20 +1870,20 @@ static bool compareRPDelta(const RegPres
// Avoid increasing the max critical pressure in the scheduled region.
if (LHS.Excess.UnitIncrease != RHS.Excess.UnitIncrease) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "RP excess top - bot: "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " RP excess top - bot: "
<< (LHS.Excess.UnitIncrease - RHS.Excess.UnitIncrease) << '\n');
return LHS.Excess.UnitIncrease < RHS.Excess.UnitIncrease;
}
// Avoid increasing the max critical pressure in the scheduled region.
if (LHS.CriticalMax.UnitIncrease != RHS.CriticalMax.UnitIncrease) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "RP critical top - bot: "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " RP critical top - bot: "
<< (LHS.CriticalMax.UnitIncrease - RHS.CriticalMax.UnitIncrease)
<< '\n');
return LHS.CriticalMax.UnitIncrease < RHS.CriticalMax.UnitIncrease;
}
// Avoid increasing the max pressure of the entire region.
if (LHS.CurrentMax.UnitIncrease != RHS.CurrentMax.UnitIncrease) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "RP current top - bot: "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << " RP current top - bot: "
<< (LHS.CurrentMax.UnitIncrease - RHS.CurrentMax.UnitIncrease)
<< '\n');
return LHS.CurrentMax.UnitIncrease < RHS.CurrentMax.UnitIncrease;
@@ -1992,8 +1999,7 @@ void ConvergingScheduler::pickNodeFromQu
static void tracePick(const ConvergingScheduler::SchedCandidate &Cand,
bool IsTop) {
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Pick " << (IsTop ? "Top" : "Bot")
- << " SU(" << Cand.SU->NodeNum << ") "
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Pick " << (IsTop ? "Top " : "Bot ")
<< ConvergingScheduler::getReasonStr(Cand.Reason) << '\n');
}
@@ -2003,10 +2009,12 @@ SUnit *ConvergingScheduler::pickNodeBidi
// efficient, but also provides the best heuristics for CriticalPSets.
if (SUnit *SU = Bot.pickOnlyChoice()) {
IsTopNode = false;
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Pick Top NOCAND\n");
return SU;
}
if (SUnit *SU = Top.pickOnlyChoice()) {
IsTopNode = true;
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Pick Bot NOCAND\n");
return SU;
}
CandPolicy NoPolicy;
@@ -2104,7 +2112,7 @@ SUnit *ConvergingScheduler::pickNode(boo
if (SU->isBottomReady())
Bot.removeReady(SU);
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "Scheduling " << *SU->getInstr());
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Scheduling SU(" << SU->NodeNum << ") " << *SU->getInstr());
return SU;
}
@@ -2250,12 +2258,12 @@ public:
SUnit *SU = ReadyQ.back();
ReadyQ.pop_back();
IsTopNode = false;
- DEBUG(dbgs() << "*** Scheduling " << "SU(" << SU->NodeNum << "): "
- << *SU->getInstr()
+ DEBUG(dbgs() << "Pick node " << "SU(" << SU->NodeNum << ") "
<< " ILP: " << DAG->getDFSResult()->getILP(SU)
<< " Tree: " << DAG->getDFSResult()->getSubtreeID(SU) << " @"
<< DAG->getDFSResult()->getSubtreeLevel(
- DAG->getDFSResult()->getSubtreeID(SU)) << '\n');
+ DAG->getDFSResult()->getSubtreeID(SU)) << '\n'
+ << "Scheduling " << *SU->getInstr());
return SU;
}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list