[llvm] r178291 - Make Win32 put the SRet address into EAX, fixes PR15556
Timur Iskhodzhanov
timurrrr at google.com
Fri Mar 29 11:59:28 PDT 2013
Which one, X86___complex-fca.ll ?
2013/3/29 NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com>:
> Timur, I guess you should update one more test as well.
> See also; http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/ninja-clang-i686-msc17-R/builds/246
>
> ...Takumi
>
> 2013/3/29 Timur Iskhodzhanov <timurrrr at google.com>:
>> Author: timurrrr
>> Date: Thu Mar 28 16:30:04 2013
>> New Revision: 178291
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=178291&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make Win32 put the SRet address into EAX, fixes PR15556
>>
>> Modified:
>> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
>> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
>> llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win32_sret.ll
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp?rev=178291&r1=178290&r2=178291&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86FastISel.cpp Thu Mar 28 16:30:04 2013
>> @@ -816,14 +816,16 @@ bool X86FastISel::X86SelectRet(const Ins
>> // The x86-64 ABI for returning structs by value requires that we copy
>> // the sret argument into %rax for the return. We saved the argument into
>> // a virtual register in the entry block, so now we copy the value out
>> - // and into %rax.
>> - if (Subtarget->is64Bit() && F.hasStructRetAttr()) {
>> + // and into %rax. We also do the same with %eax for Win32.
>> + if (F.hasStructRetAttr() &&
>> + (Subtarget->is64Bit() || Subtarget->isTargetWindows())) {
>> unsigned Reg = X86MFInfo->getSRetReturnReg();
>> assert(Reg &&
>> "SRetReturnReg should have been set in LowerFormalArguments()!");
>> + unsigned RetReg = Subtarget->is64Bit() ? X86::RAX : X86::EAX;
>> BuildMI(*FuncInfo.MBB, FuncInfo.InsertPt, DL, TII.get(TargetOpcode::COPY),
>> - X86::RAX).addReg(Reg);
>> - RetRegs.push_back(X86::RAX);
>> + RetReg).addReg(Reg);
>> + RetRegs.push_back(RetReg);
>> }
>>
>> // Now emit the RET.
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp?rev=178291&r1=178290&r2=178291&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp Thu Mar 28 16:30:04 2013
>> @@ -1666,10 +1666,11 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerReturn(SDValue C
>>
>> // The x86-64 ABIs require that for returning structs by value we copy
>> // the sret argument into %rax/%eax (depending on ABI) for the return.
>> + // Win32 requires us to put the sret argument to %eax as well.
>> // We saved the argument into a virtual register in the entry block,
>> // so now we copy the value out and into %rax/%eax.
>> - if (Subtarget->is64Bit() &&
>> - DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction()->hasStructRetAttr()) {
>> + if (DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction()->hasStructRetAttr() &&
>> + (Subtarget->is64Bit() || Subtarget->isTargetWindows())) {
>> MachineFunction &MF = DAG.getMachineFunction();
>> X86MachineFunctionInfo *FuncInfo = MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>();
>> unsigned Reg = FuncInfo->getSRetReturnReg();
>> @@ -1677,12 +1678,14 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerReturn(SDValue C
>> "SRetReturnReg should have been set in LowerFormalArguments().");
>> SDValue Val = DAG.getCopyFromReg(Chain, dl, Reg, getPointerTy());
>>
>> - unsigned RetValReg = Subtarget->isTarget64BitILP32() ? X86::EAX : X86::RAX;
>> + unsigned RetValReg
>> + = (Subtarget->is64Bit() && !Subtarget->isTarget64BitILP32()) ?
>> + X86::RAX : X86::EAX;
>> Chain = DAG.getCopyToReg(Chain, dl, RetValReg, Val, Flag);
>> Flag = Chain.getValue(1);
>>
>> // RAX/EAX now acts like a return value.
>> - RetOps.push_back(DAG.getRegister(RetValReg, MVT::i64));
>> + RetOps.push_back(DAG.getRegister(RetValReg, getPointerTy()));
>> }
>>
>> RetOps[0] = Chain; // Update chain.
>> @@ -2036,9 +2039,11 @@ X86TargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments(
>>
>> // The x86-64 ABIs require that for returning structs by value we copy
>> // the sret argument into %rax/%eax (depending on ABI) for the return.
>> + // Win32 requires us to put the sret argument to %eax as well.
>> // Save the argument into a virtual register so that we can access it
>> // from the return points.
>> - if (Is64Bit && MF.getFunction()->hasStructRetAttr()) {
>> + if (MF.getFunction()->hasStructRetAttr() &&
>> + (Subtarget->is64Bit() || Subtarget->isTargetWindows())) {
>> X86MachineFunctionInfo *FuncInfo = MF.getInfo<X86MachineFunctionInfo>();
>> unsigned Reg = FuncInfo->getSRetReturnReg();
>> if (!Reg) {
>>
>> Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win32_sret.ll
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win32_sret.ll?rev=178291&r1=178290&r2=178291&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win32_sret.ll (original)
>> +++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/X86/win32_sret.ll Thu Mar 28 16:30:04 2013
>> @@ -1,28 +1,84 @@
>> -; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=WIN_X32
>> -; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-mingw32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=MINGW_X32
>> +; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=WIN32
>> +; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-mingw32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=MINGW_X86
>> ; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i386-pc-linux | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LINUX
>> -; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=WIN_X32
>> -; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=i686-pc-mingw32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=MINGW_X32
>> +; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=i686-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=WIN32
>> +; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=i686-pc-mingw32 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=MINGW_X86
>> ; RUN: llc < %s -O0 -mtriple=i386-pc-linux | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=LINUX
>>
>> ; The SysV ABI used by most Unixes and Mingw on x86 specifies that an sret pointer
>> ; is callee-cleanup. However, in MSVC's cdecl calling convention, sret pointer
>> ; arguments are caller-cleanup like normal arguments.
>>
>> -define void @sret1(i8* sret) nounwind {
>> +define void @sret1(i8* sret %x) nounwind {
>> entry:
>> -; WIN_X32: {{ret$}}
>> -; MINGW_X32: ret $4
>> +; WIN32: sret1
>> +; WIN32: movb $42, (%eax)
>> +; WIN32-NOT: popl %eax
>> +; WIN32: {{ret$}}
>> +
>> +; MINGW_X86: sret1
>> +; MINGW_X86: ret $4
>> +
>> +; LINUX: sret1
>> ; LINUX: ret $4
>> +
>> + store i8 42, i8* %x, align 4
>> ret void
>> }
>>
>> -define void @sret2(i32* sret %x, i32 %y) nounwind {
>> +define void @sret2(i8* sret %x, i8 %y) nounwind {
>> entry:
>> -; WIN_X32: {{ret$}}
>> -; MINGW_X32: ret $4
>> +; WIN32: sret2
>> +; WIN32: movb {{.*}}, (%eax)
>> +; WIN32-NOT: popl %eax
>> +; WIN32: {{ret$}}
>> +
>> +; MINGW_X86: sret2
>> +; MINGW_X86: ret $4
>> +
>> +; LINUX: sret2
>> ; LINUX: ret $4
>> - store i32 %y, i32* %x
>> +
>> + store i8 %y, i8* %x
>> ret void
>> }
>>
>> +define void @sret3(i8* sret %x, i8* %y) nounwind {
>> +entry:
>> +; WIN32: sret3
>> +; WIN32: movb $42, (%eax)
>> +; WIN32-NOT: movb $13, (%eax)
>> +; WIN32-NOT: popl %eax
>> +; WIN32: {{ret$}}
>> +
>> +; MINGW_X86: sret3
>> +; MINGW_X86: ret $4
>> +
>> +; LINUX: sret3
>> +; LINUX: ret $4
>> +
>> + store i8 42, i8* %x
>> + store i8 13, i8* %y
>> + ret void
>> +}
>> +
>> +; PR15556
>> +%struct.S4 = type { i32, i32, i32 }
>> +
>> +define void @sret4(%struct.S4* noalias sret %agg.result) {
>> +entry:
>> +; WIN32: sret4
>> +; WIN32: movl $42, (%eax)
>> +; WIN32-NOT: popl %eax
>> +; WIN32: {{ret$}}
>> +
>> +; MINGW_X86: sret4
>> +; MINGW_X86: ret $4
>> +
>> +; LINUX: sret4
>> +; LINUX: ret $4
>> +
>> + %x = getelementptr inbounds %struct.S4* %agg.result, i32 0, i32 0
>> + store i32 42, i32* %x, align 4
>> + ret void
>> +}
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list