[LLVMdev] Vector splitting vs widening
Hal Finkel
hfinkel at anl.gov
Wed Mar 6 13:21:49 PST 2013
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>
> To: "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr>
> Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:52:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Vector splitting vs widening
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Duncan Sands" <baldrick at free.fr>
> > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 12:23:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Vector splitting vs widening
> >
> > Hi Hal,
> >
> > On 05/03/13 18:50, Hal Finkel wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Working on my (currently out-of-tree) BG/Q PPC enhancements, I've
> > > run into the following problem with vector type legalization.
> > > Here's a quick example:
> > >
> > > Scalarize node result 0: 0x2348420: v1f32 = extract_subvector
> > > 0x23434a0, 0x2348320 [ID=0]
> > >
> > > Scalarize node result 0: 0x2348220: v1f32 = extract_subvector
> > > 0x23434a0, 0x23466e0 [ID=0]
> > >
> > > Split node result: 0x23469e0: v4f32 = extract_subvector
> > > 0x23435a0,
> > > 0x23466e0 [ID=0]
> > >
> > > Split node operand: 0x2346be0: v4i1 = setcc 0x23467e0, 0x23469e0,
> > > 0x23436a0 [ID=0]
> > >
> > > Split node result: 0x2348620: v2f32 = extract_subvector
> > > 0x23435a0,
> > > 0x2346de0 [ID=0]
> > >
> > > Widen node result 0: 0x2348820: v2i1 = setcc 0x2346ee0,
> > > 0x2348620,
> > > 0x23436a0 [ID=0]
> > >
> > > llc: lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeTypes.h:599: llvm::SDValue
> > > llvm::DAGTypeLegalizer::GetWidenedVector(llvm::SDValue):
> > > Assertion
> > > `WidenedOp.getNode() && "Operand wasn't widened?"' failed.
> > >
> > > The problem is essentially the following: there are no vector f32
> > > types (yet), so the <v4i1> = setcc <v4f32> node needs to be split
> > > and scalarized. The operand splitting seems to start correctly,
> > > but because <v4i1> is itself a legal type, after splitting the
> > > node into <v2i1> = setcc <v2f32>, the process becomes confused.
> > > The operands are again split (as they should be), but it tries to
> > > widen the <v2i1> result back to <v4i1> (thus hitting the operand
> > > assertion).
> >
> > on your platform, are there any legal integer vectors types with
> > two
> > elements
> > (eg: v2i32)?
>
> Hi, Duncan. No, the only legal types (aside from the scalars) are
> v4f64 and v4i1.
For the sake of discussion, I've attached a small patch which seems to "fix" the problem. What do you think of this approach? In short, when we would otherwise widen the result type it checks to see if any of the operands requires splitting. If so, the widening is skipped.
Thanks again,
Hal
>
> Thanks again,
> Hal
>
> >
> > Ciao, Duncan.
> >
> > >
> > > In some sense, the problem is that DAGTypeLegalizer::run decides
> > > what to do solely based on the result of calling
> > > getTypeAction(ResultVT), but it seems that in this case the
> > > operand types need to be accounted for in this determination.
> > > Enhancing the logic there to consider the result types in this
> > > case seems like it should be straightforward, but how general a
> > > problem is this? [Can this problem only happen with vsetcc
> > > nodes?]
> > >
> > > Maybe, for example, after the ScanOperands part of
> > > DAGTypeLegalizer::run, if we need to reanalyze, we should
> > > actually
> > > run ScanOperands again instead of starting with the result-type
> > > processing?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Hal
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: splitwide.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1253 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130306/3e4e372c/attachment.bin>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list