[PATCH] Fix sampler test after fixing wait insertion

Tom Stellard tom at stellard.net
Fri Mar 1 09:36:32 PST 2013


On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 06:29:26PM +0100, Christian K├Ânig wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> nearly missed that, but after fixing the wait insertion pass we need
> to update the regression test as well.
> 

Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <thomas.stellard at amd.com>

> Patch is attached, please review,
> Christian.

> From 52703558b4935ea4802965a2aac31ff219892b14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20K=C3=B6nig?= <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 18:24:00 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] R600/SI: fix sampler tests after fixing wait insertions
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian K??nig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
>  test/CodeGen/R600/llvm.SI.sample.ll |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/CodeGen/R600/llvm.SI.sample.ll b/test/CodeGen/R600/llvm.SI.sample.ll
> index 34d1935..d397f3b 100644
> --- a/test/CodeGen/R600/llvm.SI.sample.ll
> +++ b/test/CodeGen/R600/llvm.SI.sample.ll
> @@ -1,35 +1,35 @@
>  ;RUN: llc < %s -march=r600 -mcpu=SI | FileCheck %s
>  
>  ;CHECK: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE_C
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE_C
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE_C
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE_C
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE_C
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE_C
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
> -;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1792
> +;CHECK-NEXT: S_WAITCNT 1904
>  ;CHECK-NEXT: IMAGE_SAMPLE
>  
>  define void @test() {
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list