[llvm] r176023 - Fix spelling noticed by Duncan.
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 06:29:38 PST 2013
Author: chandlerc
Date: Mon Feb 25 08:29:38 2013
New Revision: 176023
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=176023&view=rev
Log:
Fix spelling noticed by Duncan.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp?rev=176023&r1=176022&r2=176023&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAG.cpp Mon Feb 25 08:29:38 2013
@@ -3867,7 +3867,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemcpy(SDValue
unsigned Align, bool isVol, bool AlwaysInline,
MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo,
MachinePointerInfo SrcPtrInfo) {
- assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reservers 0");
+ assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reserves 0");
// Check to see if we should lower the memcpy to loads and stores first.
// For cases within the target-specified limits, this is the best choice.
@@ -3935,7 +3935,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemmove(SDValue
unsigned Align, bool isVol,
MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo,
MachinePointerInfo SrcPtrInfo) {
- assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reservers 0");
+ assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reserves 0");
// Check to see if we should lower the memmove to loads and stores first.
// For cases within the target-specified limits, this is the best choice.
@@ -3990,7 +3990,7 @@ SDValue SelectionDAG::getMemset(SDValue
SDValue Src, SDValue Size,
unsigned Align, bool isVol,
MachinePointerInfo DstPtrInfo) {
- assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reservers 0");
+ assert(Align && "The SDAG layer expects explicit alignment and reserves 0");
// Check to see if we should lower the memset to stores first.
// For cases within the target-specified limits, this is the best choice.
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list