[llvm] r175334 - [ms-inline asm] Do not omit the frame pointer if we have ms-inline assembly.

[Eric Christopher]

>
> Should be no different than anything in any other asm block?
>
> I.e. why conditionalize it?
>
>
> As in why do it for MS-style only?  AFAIK, the MSVC compiler has the same
> behavior (i.e., it always omits a frame pointer).  As for GNU-style
> assembly, no one has complained, so why change something that doesn't
> appear to be broken.
>
> Or why do it at all?
>
>
> Because I've had external developers complain and because of the MSVC
> compatibility issue (which could be a correctness issue depending on how
> crazy the developer wants to get; again, no judgement ;).
>
>
Heh. Cool deal. Thanks for the explanation!

-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20130215/8c459ea0/attachment.html>