Review request: generate DWARF pubnames under a compiler option
Krzysztof Parzyszek
kparzysz at codeaurora.org
Mon Feb 11 14:32:13 PST 2013
On 2/11/2013 4:20 PM, Eric Christopher wrote:
>
> Mmm.. I'd prefer you use llvm-dwarfdump after making an object file with
> it. Also, I'd hope that whatever way you're iterating over the list is
> stable.
The names are emitted using a StringMap::iterator. I'll have to check
if that's stable. If not, I can change the emission of names to be
stable. The code in llvm-dwarfdump displays the names in the order in
which they appear in the binary.
Regarding the testcase---let me see if I understand: I'll use llc to
create the .o, and then pass the .o to llvm-dwarfdump, and | the result
through FileCheck to see if all the expected names are there. Is that
correct?
I'll split the updates to llvm-dwarfdump to a separate commit (that will
be the first of the two).
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list