[llvm-commits] [llvm] r173343 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/SpeculativeExec.ll
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 05:24:24 PST 2013
Author: chandlerc
Date: Thu Jan 24 07:24:24 2013
New Revision: 173343
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=173343&view=rev
Log:
Revert r173342 temporarily. It appears to cause a very late miscompile
of stage2 in a bootstrap. Still investigating....
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/SpeculativeExec.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp?rev=173343&r1=173342&r2=173343&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Utils/SimplifyCFG.cpp Thu Jan 24 07:24:24 2013
@@ -1369,8 +1369,7 @@
/// \endcode
///
/// \returns true if the conditional block is removed.
-static bool SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *ThenBB,
- const TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {
+static bool SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BranchInst *BI, BasicBlock *ThenBB) {
// Be conservative for now. FP select instruction can often be expensive.
Value *BrCond = BI->getCondition();
if (isa<FCmpInst>(BrCond))
@@ -1399,22 +1398,15 @@
// Only speculatively execution a single instruction (not counting the
// terminator) for now.
- SpeculationCost += TTI.getUserCost(I);
- if (SpeculationCost > TargetTransformInfo::TCC_Basic)
+ ++SpeculationCost;
+ if (SpeculationCost > 1)
return false;
// Don't hoist the instruction if it's unsafe or expensive.
if (!isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute(I))
return false;
- // FIXME: This should really be a cost metric, but our cost model doesn't
- // accurately model the expense of select.
- if (isa<SelectInst>(I))
+ if (ComputeSpeculationCost(I) > PHINodeFoldingThreshold)
return false;
- // FIXME: The cost metric currently doesn't reason accurately about simple
- // versus complex GEPs, take a conservative approach here.
- if (GEPOperator *GEP = dyn_cast<GEPOperator>(I))
- if (!GEP->hasAllConstantIndices())
- return false;
// Do not hoist the instruction if any of its operands are defined but not
// used in this BB. The transformation will prevent the operand from
@@ -1457,10 +1449,9 @@
// Account for the cost of an unfolded ConstantExpr which could end up
// getting expanded into Instructions.
// FIXME: This doesn't account for how many operations are combined in the
- // constant expression. The cost functions in TTI don't yet correctly model
- // constant expression costs.
- SpeculationCost += TargetTransformInfo::TCC_Basic;
- if (SpeculationCost > TargetTransformInfo::TCC_Basic)
+ // constant expression.
+ ++SpeculationCost;
+ if (SpeculationCost > 1)
return false;
}
@@ -3877,7 +3868,7 @@
TerminatorInst *Succ0TI = BI->getSuccessor(0)->getTerminator();
if (Succ0TI->getNumSuccessors() == 1 &&
Succ0TI->getSuccessor(0) == BI->getSuccessor(1))
- if (SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BI, BI->getSuccessor(0), TTI))
+ if (SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BI, BI->getSuccessor(0)))
return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, TD) | true;
}
} else if (BI->getSuccessor(1)->getSinglePredecessor() != 0) {
@@ -3886,7 +3877,7 @@
TerminatorInst *Succ1TI = BI->getSuccessor(1)->getTerminator();
if (Succ1TI->getNumSuccessors() == 1 &&
Succ1TI->getSuccessor(0) == BI->getSuccessor(0))
- if (SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BI, BI->getSuccessor(1), TTI))
+ if (SpeculativelyExecuteBB(BI, BI->getSuccessor(1)))
return SimplifyCFG(BB, TTI, TD) | true;
}
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/SpeculativeExec.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/SpeculativeExec.ll?rev=173343&r1=173342&r2=173343&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/SpeculativeExec.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/SpeculativeExec.ll Thu Jan 24 07:24:24 2013
@@ -108,32 +108,3 @@
ret i8* %x10
}
-
-define i16 @test5(i1* %dummy, i16 %a, i16 %b) {
-; Test that we speculate no-op instructions.
-; CHECK: @test5
-
-entry:
- %cond1 = load volatile i1* %dummy
- br i1 %cond1, label %if, label %end
-
-if:
- %cond2 = load volatile i1* %dummy
- %a.conv = sext i16 %a to i32
- %b.conv = sext i16 %b to i32
- %cmp = icmp ult i32 %a.conv, %b.conv
- br i1 %cond2, label %then, label %end
-
-then:
- %sub = sub i32 %a.conv, %b.conv
- %sub.conv = trunc i32 %sub to i16
- br label %end
-
-end:
- %x = phi i16 [ %a, %entry ], [ %b, %if ], [ %sub.conv, %then ]
-; CHECK-NOT: phi
-; CHECK: select i1
-
- ret i16 %x
-}
-
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list