[llvm-commits] [llvm] r172534 - /llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/post-inc-icmpzero.ll

Dmitri Gribenko gribozavr at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 11:20:44 PST 2013


On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote:
> On 15 January 2013 18:55, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Back to the issue at hand, I couldn't find any difference on the
>>> outputs on x86_64, A9 and A15, (literally, identical outputs), which
>>> shows that the issue has nothing to do with ARM and the test should
>>> also be failing on other architectures as of r171697-ish.
>>>
>>> All outputs had:
>>>
>>>   %4 = sub i64 %sub.ptr.lhs.cast, %sub.ptr.rhs.cast
>>
>> OK, but the outputs are different *now*.
>
> And why I asked if it shouldn't be failing on x86 as well, but it seems not:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-x86_64-ubuntu/builds/6935
>
> That's after r171697 and before 172534, so it *should* be failing, but
> it didn't.
>
> Don't ask me why not. As far as I can see, it should fail on all
> architectures. The only differences between my Intel binaries and my
> ARM  ones is that I used CMake to build the Intel ones and autoconf on
> ARM ones, and I'm building outside the tree, when the buildbots are
> not.

So what is the difference between outputs on ARM and x86 right now?

Dmitri

-- 
main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
(j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list