[llvm-commits] [llvm] r169269 - /llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.rst

Sean Silva silvas at purdue.edu
Tue Dec 4 17:45:24 PST 2012


+1 for improving documentation content.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote:
> Author: eliben
> Date: Tue Dec  4 08:34:00 2012
> New Revision: 169269
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=169269&view=rev
> Log:
> Get rid of references to Tcl, DejagGNU, old test structure, discourage the use
> of grep in favor of FileCheck, and other cleanups.
>
> Modified:
>     llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.rst
>
> Modified: llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.rst
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.rst?rev=169269&r1=169268&r2=169269&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.rst (original)
> +++ llvm/trunk/docs/TestingGuide.rst Tue Dec  4 08:34:00 2012
> @@ -176,12 +176,12 @@
>
>  The regression test structure is very simple, but does require some
>  information to be set. This information is gathered via ``configure``
> -and is written to a file, ``lit.site.cfg`` in ``llvm/test``. The
> -``llvm/test`` Makefile does this work for you.
> +and is written to a file, ``test/lit.site.cfg`` in the build directory.
> +The ``llvm/test`` Makefile does this work for you.
>
>  In order for the regression tests to work, each directory of tests must
> -have a ``lit.local.cfg`` file. Lit looks for this file to determine how
> -to run the tests. This file is just Python code and thus is very
> +have a ``lit.local.cfg`` file. :program:`lit` looks for this file to determine
> +how to run the tests. This file is just Python code and thus is very
>  flexible, but we've standardized it for the LLVM regression tests. If
>  you're adding a directory of tests, just copy ``lit.local.cfg`` from
>  another directory to get running. The standard ``lit.local.cfg`` simply
> @@ -189,28 +189,24 @@
>  only directories does not need the ``lit.local.cfg`` file. Read the :doc:`Lit
>  documentation <CommandGuide/lit>` for more information.
>
> -The ``llvm-runtests`` function looks at each file that is passed to it
> -and gathers any lines together that match "RUN:". These are the "RUN"
> -lines that specify how the test is to be run. So, each test script must
> -contain RUN lines if it is to do anything. If there are no RUN lines,
> -the ``llvm-runtests`` function will issue an error and the test will
> -fail.
> +Each test file must contain lines starting with "RUN:" that tell :program:`lit`
> +how to run it. If there are no RUN lines, :program:`lit` will issue an error
> +while running a test.
>
>  RUN lines are specified in the comments of the test program using the
>  keyword ``RUN`` followed by a colon, and lastly the command (pipeline)
> -to execute. Together, these lines form the "script" that
> -``llvm-runtests`` executes to run the test case. The syntax of the RUN
> -lines is similar to a shell's syntax for pipelines including I/O
> -redirection and variable substitution. However, even though these lines
> -may *look* like a shell script, they are not. RUN lines are interpreted
> -directly by the Tcl ``exec`` command. They are never executed by a
> -shell. Consequently the syntax differs from normal shell script syntax
> -in a few ways. You can specify as many RUN lines as needed.
> +to execute. Together, these lines form the "script" that :program:`lit`
> +executes to run the test case. The syntax of the RUN lines is similar to a
> +shell's syntax for pipelines including I/O redirection and variable
> +substitution. However, even though these lines may *look* like a shell
> +script, they are not. RUN lines are interpreted by :program:`lit`.
> +Consequently, the syntax differs from shell in a few ways. You can specify
> +as many RUN lines as needed.
>
> -lit performs substitution on each RUN line to replace LLVM tool names
> +:program:`lit` performs substitution on each RUN line to replace LLVM tool names
>  with the full paths to the executable built for each tool (in
> -$(LLVM\_OBJ\_ROOT)/$(BuildMode)/bin). This ensures that lit does not
> -invoke any stray LLVM tools in the user's path during testing.
> +``$(LLVM_OBJ_ROOT)/$(BuildMode)/bin)``. This ensures that :program:`lit` does
> +not invoke any stray LLVM tools in the user's path during testing.
>
>  Each RUN line is executed on its own, distinct from other lines unless
>  its last character is ``\``. This continuation character causes the RUN
> @@ -218,8 +214,8 @@
>  long pipelines of commands without making huge line lengths. The lines
>  ending in ``\`` are concatenated until a RUN line that doesn't end in
>  ``\`` is found. This concatenated set of RUN lines then constitutes one
> -execution. Tcl will substitute variables and arrange for the pipeline to
> -be executed. If any process in the pipeline fails, the entire line (and
> +execution. :program:`lit` will substitute variables and arrange for the pipeline
> +to be executed. If any process in the pipeline fails, the entire line (and
>  test case) fails too.
>
>  Below is an example of legal RUN lines in a ``.ll`` file:
> @@ -230,103 +226,65 @@
>      ; RUN: llvm-dis < %s.bc-13 > %t2
>      ; RUN: diff %t1 %t2
>
> -As with a Unix shell, the RUN: lines permit pipelines and I/O
> +As with a Unix shell, the RUN lines permit pipelines and I/O
>  redirection to be used. However, the usage is slightly different than
> -for Bash. To check what's legal, see the documentation for the `Tcl
> -exec <http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/TclCmd/exec.htm#M2>`_ command and the
> -`tutorial <http://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.5/tutorial/Tcl26.html>`_. The
> -major differences are:
> -
> --  You can't do ``2>&1``. That will cause Tcl to write to a file named
> -   ``&1``. Usually this is done to get stderr to go through a pipe. You
> -   can do that in tcl with ``|&`` so replace this idiom:
> +for Bash. In general, it's useful to read the code of other tests to figure out
> +what you can use in yours. The major differences are:
> +
> +-  You can't do ``2>&1``. That will cause :program:`lit` to write to a file
> +   named ``&1``. Usually this is done to get stderr to go through a pipe. You
> +   can do that with ``|&`` so replace this idiom:
>     ``... 2>&1 | grep`` with ``... |& grep``
>  -  You can only redirect to a file, not to another descriptor and not
>     from a here document.
> --  tcl supports redirecting to open files with the @ syntax but you
> -   shouldn't use that here.
>
>  There are some quoting rules that you must pay attention to when writing
> -your RUN lines. In general nothing needs to be quoted. Tcl won't strip
> -off any quote characters so they will get passed to the invoked program.
> +your RUN lines. In general nothing needs to be quoted. :program:`lit` won't
> +strip off any quote characters so they will get passed to the invoked program.
>  For example:
>
>  .. code-block:: bash
>
>      ... | grep 'find this string'
>
> -This will fail because the ' characters are passed to grep. This would
> -instruction grep to look for ``'find`` in the files ``this`` and
> -``string'``. To avoid this use curly braces to tell Tcl that it should
> -treat everything enclosed as one value. So our example would become:
> +This will fail because the ``'`` characters are passed to ``grep``. This would
> +make ``grep`` to look for ``'find`` in the files ``this`` and
> +``string'``. To avoid this use curly braces to tell :program:`lit` that it
> +should treat everything enclosed as one value. So our example would become:
>
>  .. code-block:: bash
>
>      ... | grep {find this string}
>
> -Additionally, the characters ``[`` and ``]`` are treated specially by
> -Tcl. They tell Tcl to interpret the content as a command to execute.
> -Since these characters are often used in regular expressions this can
> -have disastrous results and cause the entire test run in a directory to
> -fail. For example, a common idiom is to look for some basicblock number:
> -
> -.. code-block:: bash
> -
> -    ... | grep bb[2-8]
> -
> -This, however, will cause Tcl to fail because its going to try to
> -execute a program named "2-8". Instead, what you want is this:
> -
> -.. code-block:: bash
> -
> -    ... | grep {bb\[2-8\]}
> -
> -Finally, if you need to pass the ``\`` character down to a program, then
> -it must be doubled. This is another Tcl special character. So, suppose
> -you had:
> -
> -.. code-block:: bash
> -
> -    ... | grep 'i32\*'
> -
> -This will fail to match what you want (a pointer to i32). First, the
> -``'`` do not get stripped off. Second, the ``\`` gets stripped off by
> -Tcl so what grep sees is: ``'i32*'``. That's not likely to match
> -anything. To resolve this you must use ``\\`` and the ``{}``, like this:
> -
> -.. code-block:: bash
> -
> -    ... | grep {i32\\*}
> -
> -If your system includes GNU ``grep``, make sure that ``GREP_OPTIONS`` is
> -not set in your environment. Otherwise, you may get invalid results
> -(both false positives and false negatives).
> +In general, you should strive to keep your RUN lines as simple as possible,
> +using them only to run tools that generate the output you can then examine. The
> +recommended way to examine output to figure out if the test passes it using the
> +:doc:`FileCheck tool <CommandGuide/FileCheck>`. The usage of ``grep`` in RUN
> +lines is discouraged.
>
>  The FileCheck utility
>  ---------------------
>
> -A powerful feature of the RUN: lines is that it allows any arbitrary
> +A powerful feature of the RUN lines is that it allows any arbitrary
>  commands to be executed as part of the test harness. While standard
> -(portable) unix tools like 'grep' work fine on run lines, as you see
> -above, there are a lot of caveats due to interaction with Tcl syntax,
> +(portable) unix tools like ``grep`` work fine on run lines, as you see
> +above, there are a lot of caveats due to interaction with shell syntax,
>  and we want to make sure the run lines are portable to a wide range of
> -systems. Another major problem is that grep is not very good at checking
> +systems. Another major problem is that ``grep`` is not very good at checking
>  to verify that the output of a tools contains a series of different
> -output in a specific order. The FileCheck tool was designed to help with
> -these problems.
> +output in a specific order. The :program:`FileCheck` tool was designed to
> +help with these problems.
>
> -FileCheck is designed to read a file to check from standard input, and the set
> -of things to verify from a file specified as a command line argument.
> -FileCheck is described in :doc:`the FileCheck man page
> +:program:`FileCheck` is designed to read a file to check from standard input,
> +and the set of things to verify from a file specified as a command line
> +argument. :program:`FileCheck` is described in :doc:`the FileCheck man page
>  <CommandGuide/FileCheck>`.
>
>  Variables and substitutions
>  ---------------------------
>
>  With a RUN line there are a number of substitutions that are permitted.
> -In general, any Tcl variable that is available in the ``substitute``
> -function (in ``test/lib/llvm.exp``) can be substituted into a RUN line.
> -To make a substitution just write the variable's name preceded by a $.
> +To make a substitution just write the variable's name preceded by a ``$``.
>  Additionally, for compatibility reasons with previous versions of the
>  test library, certain names can be accessed with an alternate syntax: a
>  % prefix. These alternates are deprecated and may go away in a future
> @@ -337,15 +295,15 @@
>
>  ``$test`` (``%s``)
>     The full path to the test case's source. This is suitable for passing on
> -   the command line as the input to an llvm tool.
> +   the command line as the input to an LLVM tool.
>
>  ``%(line)``, ``%(line+<number>)``, ``%(line-<number>)``
>     The number of the line where this variable is used, with an optional
> -   integer offset. This can be used in tests with multiple RUN: lines,
> +   integer offset. This can be used in tests with multiple RUN lines,
>     which reference test file's line numbers.
>
>  ``$srcdir``
> -   The source directory from where the "``make check``" was run.
> +   The source directory from where the ``make check`` was run.
>
>  ``objdir``
>     The object directory that corresponds to the ``$srcdir``.
> @@ -378,23 +336,18 @@
>
>  ``link`` (``%link``)
>     This full link command used to link LLVM executables. This has all the
> -   configured -I, -L and -l options.
> +   configured ``-I``, ``-L`` and ``-l`` options.
>
>  ``shlibext`` (``%shlibext``)
> -   The suffix for the host platforms share library (dll) files. This
> +   The suffix for the host platforms shared library (DLL) files. This
>     includes the period as the first character.
>
> -To add more variables, two things need to be changed. First, add a line
> -in the ``test/Makefile`` that creates the ``site.exp`` file. This will
> -"set" the variable as a global in the site.exp file. Second, in the
> -``test/lib/llvm.exp`` file, in the substitute proc, add the variable
> -name to the list of "global" declarations at the beginning of the proc.
> -That's it, the variable can then be used in test scripts.
> +To add more variables, look at ``test/lit.cfg``.
>
>  Other Features
>  --------------
>
> -To make RUN line writing easier, there are several shell scripts located
> +To make RUN line writing easier, there are several helper scripts and programs
>  in the ``llvm/test/Scripts`` directory. This directory is in the PATH
>  when running tests, so you can just call these scripts using their name.
>  For example:
> @@ -408,9 +361,7 @@
>     purposefully ignoring the result code of the tool
>  ``not``
>     This script runs its arguments and then inverts the result code from it.
> -   Zero result codes become 1. Non-zero result codes become 0. This is
> -   useful to invert the result of a grep. For example "not grep X" means
> -   succeed only if you don't find X in the input.
> +   Zero result codes become 1. Non-zero result codes become 0.
>
>  Sometimes it is necessary to mark a test case as "expected fail" or
>  XFAIL. You can easily mark a test as XFAIL just by including ``XFAIL:``
> @@ -430,7 +381,7 @@
>
>      ; XFAIL: darwin,sun
>
> -To make the output more useful, the ``llvm_runtest`` function wil scan
> +To make the output more useful, :program:`lit` will scan
>  the lines of the test case for ones that contain a pattern that matches
>  ``PR[0-9]+``. This is the syntax for specifying a PR (Problem Report) number
>  that is related to the test case. The number after "PR" specifies the
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits



More information about the llvm-commits mailing list