[llvm-commits] [llvm] r168854 - /llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp

[Preston Briggs]

Author: prestonbriggs
Date: Wed Nov 28 22:30:52 2012
New Revision: 168854

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168854&view=rev
Log:
Cleaned up a couple of comments.

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp?rev=168854&r1=168853&r2=168854&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis.cpp Wed Nov 28 22:30:52 2012
@@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@
 //
 // It occurs to me that the presence of loop-invariant variables
 // changes the nature of the test from "greatest common divisor"
-// to "a common divisor!"
+// to "a common divisor".
 bool DependenceAnalysis::gcdMIVtest(const SCEV *Src,
                                     const SCEV *Dst,
                                     FullDependence &Result) const {
@@ -3555,7 +3555,7 @@
     }
   }
 
-  // make sure Scalar flags are set correctly
+  // Make sure the Scalar flags are set correctly.
   SmallBitVector CompleteLoops(MaxLevels + 1);
   for (unsigned SI = 0; SI < Pairs; ++SI)
     CompleteLoops |= Pair[SI].Loops;
@@ -3580,8 +3580,8 @@
     bool AllEqual = true;
     for (unsigned II = 1; II <= CommonLevels; ++II) {
       if (Result.getDirection(II) != Dependence::DVEntry::EQ) {
-	AllEqual = false;
-	break;
+        AllEqual = false;
+        break;
       }
     }
     if (AllEqual)