[llvm-commits] [llvm] r168837 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
stoklund at 2pi.dk
Wed Nov 28 16:26:12 PST 2012
Author: stoklund
Date: Wed Nov 28 18:26:11 2012
New Revision: 168837
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168837&view=rev
Log:
Avoid rewriting instructions twice.
This could cause miscompilations in targets where sub-register
composition is not always idempotent (ARM).
<rdar://problem/12758887>
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp?rev=168837&r1=168836&r2=168837&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/RegisterCoalescer.cpp Wed Nov 28 18:26:11 2012
@@ -887,8 +887,17 @@
// Update LiveDebugVariables.
LDV->renameRegister(SrcReg, DstReg, SubIdx);
+ SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 8> Visited;
for (MachineRegisterInfo::reg_iterator I = MRI->reg_begin(SrcReg);
MachineInstr *UseMI = I.skipInstruction();) {
+ // Each instruction can only be rewritten once because sub-register
+ // composition is not always idempotent. When SrcReg != DstReg, rewriting
+ // the UseMI operands removes them from the SrcReg use-def chain, but when
+ // SrcReg is DstReg we could encounter UseMI twice if it has multiple
+ // operands mentioning the virtual register.
+ if (SrcReg == DstReg && !Visited.insert(UseMI))
+ continue;
+
SmallVector<unsigned,8> Ops;
bool Reads, Writes;
tie(Reads, Writes) = UseMI->readsWritesVirtualRegister(SrcReg, &Ops);
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll?rev=168837&r1=168836&r2=168837&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/coalesce-subregs.ll Wed Nov 28 18:26:11 2012
@@ -317,3 +317,44 @@
store <2 x i64> %result.2, <2 x i64>* %agg.result, align 128
ret void
}
+
+; <rdar://problem/12758887>
+; RegisterCoalescer::updateRegDefsUses() could visit an instruction more than
+; once under rare circumstances. When widening a register from QPR to DTriple
+; with the original virtual register in dsub_1_dsub_2, the double rewrite would
+; produce an invalid sub-register.
+;
+; This is because dsub_1_dsub_2 is not an idempotent sub-register index.
+; It will translate %vr:dsub_0 -> %vr:dsub_1.
+define hidden fastcc void @radar12758887() nounwind optsize ssp {
+entry:
+ br i1 undef, label %for.body, label %for.end70
+
+for.body: ; preds = %for.end, %entry
+ br i1 undef, label %for.body29, label %for.end
+
+for.body29: ; preds = %for.body29, %for.body
+ %0 = load <2 x double>* null, align 1
+ %splat40 = shufflevector <2 x double> %0, <2 x double> undef, <2 x i32> zeroinitializer
+ %mul41 = fmul <2 x double> undef, %splat40
+ %add42 = fadd <2 x double> undef, %mul41
+ %splat44 = shufflevector <2 x double> %0, <2 x double> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 1, i32 1>
+ %mul45 = fmul <2 x double> undef, %splat44
+ %add46 = fadd <2 x double> undef, %mul45
+ br i1 undef, label %for.end, label %for.body29
+
+for.end: ; preds = %for.body29, %for.body
+ %accumR2.0.lcssa = phi <2 x double> [ zeroinitializer, %for.body ], [ %add42, %for.body29 ]
+ %accumI2.0.lcssa = phi <2 x double> [ zeroinitializer, %for.body ], [ %add46, %for.body29 ]
+ %1 = shufflevector <2 x double> %accumI2.0.lcssa, <2 x double> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 1, i32 0>
+ %add58 = fadd <2 x double> undef, %1
+ %mul61 = fmul <2 x double> %add58, undef
+ %add63 = fadd <2 x double> undef, %mul61
+ %add64 = fadd <2 x double> undef, %add63
+ %add67 = fadd <2 x double> undef, %add64
+ store <2 x double> %add67, <2 x double>* undef, align 1
+ br i1 undef, label %for.end70, label %for.body
+
+for.end70: ; preds = %for.end, %entry
+ ret void
+}
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list