[llvm-commits] ppc64 elf linux ReleaseNotes (for release_32 branch)

[Hal Finkel]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pawel Wodnicki" <pawel at 32bitmicro.com>
> To: "Ulrich Weigand" <Ulrich.Weigand at de.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov>, llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 9:44:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] ppc64 elf linux ReleaseNotes (for	release_32	branch)
> 
> 
> > Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote on 16.11.2012 23:57:27
> > 
> >> The encoding fixes to get the integrated-as working were small and
> >> safe. I approve the following commits for merging into the
> >> release:
> >> r167861, r167862, r167863, r167875, r167860, r167864
> >> (Ulrich, please let me know if that list is incomplete).
> >>
> >> Also, this one is appropriate for merging:
> >> r167737 - Make TOC contents deterministic
> >>
> >> Pawel, I'll be happy to handle the merging for you (once you have
> >> the ownership situation straightened out and re-open the release
> >> branch).
> 
> 
> For above set of commits (changeset) ownership is clear and it is
> approved by the code owner. It can be merged in the 3.2 release
> branch.
> 
> 
> >>
> >> Also, we should request that r167855 (a MachineCSE bug fix) be
> >> merged into the release. I'm not the relevant owner, however.
> > 
> > This list looks complete to me.
> > 
> > Just to verify, since I'm not familiar with the details of the
> > LLVM release process:  am I supposed to check any or all of
> > those patches into the release branch?  Or is this all handled
> > by the release maintainers?
> 
> 
> This step is not crystal clear and left to the discretion of the
> code owner/developer/release manager. I leave it up to you to
> decide who will do it, just let me know.
> 
> In the end all I need is the list of commits (changeset) that has
> been approved and merged into the 3.2 release branch.
> 
> So far we have these commits (changeset) below that have been
> approved
> r167861, r167862, r167863, r167875, r167860, r167864
> r167737

I'll take care of the merging later today.

> 
> 
> You are also requesting r167855 to be merged -
> in this case code owner has to be identified so it is on hold.
> 

Evan has approved this merge (on list; Pawel, I also forwarded the e-mail to you to make your record-keeping easier). Unless it has already been done, I can merge this in with the others later.

Thanks again,
Hal

> 
> > 
> > Bye,
> > Ulrich
> > 
> 
> Pawel
> 

-- 
Hal Finkel
Postdoctoral Appointee
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory