[llvm-commits] [patch] Use %lli instead of lli %defaultjit

[David Tweed]

So one implication I missed seeing in my reply early this morning: of course if you deliberately want to run a test using a non-default jit, you can't use %lli now. (The original patch came about because of tests that were testing something else that just happened to need to run jit'ted code but weren't during the process, such as profiling.) So I guess lli can't be outlawed.

-----Original Message-----
From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of David Tweed
Sent: 31 October 2012 08:37
To: 'Rafael Espíndola'; llvm-commits
Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [patch] Use %lli instead of lli %defaultjit

Looks fine to me. There's been a suggestion (in relation to %clang_cc1 about giving a warning if new tests are added that use a bare clang -cc1, so adding %lli is more support for disallowing bare program names.)

Cheers,
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Rafael Espíndola [mailto:rafael.espindola at gmail.com] 
Sent: 31 October 2012 02:19
To: llvm-commits
Cc: David Tweed
Subject: Re: [patch] Use %lli instead of lli %defaultjit

Attached now.

On 30 October 2012 22:19, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think %defaultjit can be replaced by %lli if we set the default jit
> to be MCJIT for ARM and PorwerPC. Is the attached patch OK?
>
> Cheers,
> Rafael




_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits