[llvm-commits] [llvm] r166875 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll

Benjamin Kramer benny.kra at googlemail.com
Sat Oct 27 07:25:51 PDT 2012


Author: d0k
Date: Sat Oct 27 09:25:51 2012
New Revision: 166875

URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=166875&view=rev
Log:
LoopIdiom: Recognize memmove loops.

This turns loops like
  for (unsigned i = 0; i != n; ++i)
    p[i] = p[i+1];
into memmove, which has a highly optimized implementation in most libcs.

This was really easy with the new DependenceAnalysis :)

Modified:
    llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
    llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll

Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp?rev=166875&r1=166874&r2=166875&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp Sat Oct 27 09:25:51 2012
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 // TODO List:
 //
 // Future loop memory idioms to recognize:
-//   memcmp, memmove, strlen, etc.
+//   memcmp, strlen, etc.
 // Future floating point idioms to recognize in -ffast-math mode:
 //   fpowi
 // Future integer operation idioms to recognize:
@@ -60,8 +60,9 @@
 #include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
 using namespace llvm;
 
-STATISTIC(NumMemSet, "Number of memset's formed from loop stores");
-STATISTIC(NumMemCpy, "Number of memcpy's formed from loop load+stores");
+STATISTIC(NumMemSet, "Number of memsets formed from loop stores");
+STATISTIC(NumMemCpy, "Number of memcpys formed from loop load+stores");
+STATISTIC(NumMemMove, "Number of memmoves formed from loop load+stores");
 
 namespace {
   class LoopIdiomRecognize : public LoopPass {
@@ -532,6 +533,7 @@
   // stores) in the loop. We ignore the direct dependency between SI and LI here
   // and check it later.
   DependenceAnalysis &DA = getAnalysis<DependenceAnalysis>();
+  bool isMemcpySafe = true;
   for (Loop::block_iterator BI = CurLoop->block_begin(),
        BE = CurLoop->block_end(); BI != BE; ++BI)
     for (BasicBlock::iterator I = (*BI)->begin(), E = (*BI)->end(); I != E; ++I)
@@ -552,8 +554,14 @@
   // Now check the dependency between SI and LI. If there is no dependency we
   // can safely emit a memcpy.
   OwningPtr<Dependence> Dep(DA.depends(SI, LI, true));
-  if (Dep)
-    return false;
+  if (Dep) {
+    // If there is a dependence but the direction is positive we can still
+    // safely turn this into memmove.
+    if (Dep->getLevels() != 1 ||
+        Dep->getDirection(1) != Dependence::DVEntry::GT)
+      return false;
+    isMemcpySafe = false;
+  }
 
   // The trip count of the loop and the base pointer of the addrec SCEV is
   // guaranteed to be loop invariant, which means that it should dominate the
@@ -590,12 +598,19 @@
   Value *NumBytes =
     Expander.expandCodeFor(NumBytesS, IntPtr, Preheader->getTerminator());
 
-  CallInst *NewCall =
-    Builder.CreateMemCpy(StoreBasePtr, LoadBasePtr, NumBytes,
-                         std::min(SI->getAlignment(), LI->getAlignment()));
+  CallInst *NewCall;
+  unsigned Align = std::min(SI->getAlignment(), LI->getAlignment());
+  if (isMemcpySafe) {
+    NewCall = Builder.CreateMemCpy(StoreBasePtr, LoadBasePtr, NumBytes, Align);
+    ++NumMemCpy;
+  } else {
+    NewCall = Builder.CreateMemMove(StoreBasePtr, LoadBasePtr, NumBytes, Align);
+    ++NumMemMove;
+  }
   NewCall->setDebugLoc(SI->getDebugLoc());
 
-  DEBUG(dbgs() << "  Formed memcpy: " << *NewCall << "\n"
+  DEBUG(dbgs() << "  Formed " << (isMemcpySafe ? "memcpy: " : "memmove: ")
+               << *NewCall << "\n"
                << "    from load ptr=" << *LoadEv << " at: " << *LI << "\n"
                << "    from store ptr=" << *StoreEv << " at: " << *SI << "\n");
 
@@ -603,6 +618,5 @@
   // Okay, the memset has been formed.  Zap the original store and anything that
   // feeds into it.
   deleteDeadInstruction(SI, *SE, TLI);
-  ++NumMemCpy;
   return true;
 }

Modified: llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll?rev=166875&r1=166874&r2=166875&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/Transforms/LoopIdiom/basic.ll Sat Oct 27 09:25:51 2012
@@ -383,4 +383,26 @@
 
 }
 
+ at p = common global [1024 x i8] zeroinitializer, align 16
 
+define void @test15(i32 %n) nounwind {
+entry:
+  %cmp6 = icmp eq i32 %n, 0
+  br i1 %cmp6, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.body:                                         ; preds = %entry, %for.body
+  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ], [ 0, %entry ]
+  %indvars.iv.next = add i64 %indvars.iv, 1
+  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [1024 x i8]* @p, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv.next
+  %0 = load i8* %arrayidx, align 1
+  %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds [1024 x i8]* @p, i64 0, i64 %indvars.iv
+  store i8 %0, i8* %arrayidx2, align 1
+  %lftr.wideiv = trunc i64 %indvars.iv.next to i32
+  %exitcond = icmp eq i32 %lftr.wideiv, %n
+  br i1 %exitcond, label %for.end, label %for.body
+
+for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.body, %entry
+  ret void
+; CHECK: @test15
+; CHECK: call void @llvm.memmove.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([1024 x i8]* @p, i32 0, i32 0), i8* getelementptr inbounds ([1024 x i8]* @p, i64 0, i64 1),
+}





More information about the llvm-commits mailing list