[llvm-commits] Fix internalize in the case where no symbols are needed
Rafael EspĂndola
rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 06:02:22 PDT 2012
> while this patch looks OK to me, what do you think about removing the
> special
> role of "main"? Is there any reason why users of this pass (eg the "opt"
> tool)
> can't just pass in "main" if they don't want "main" to be internalized?
I would *love* to do that :-)
Is the attached patch OK?
> Ciao, Duncan.
Cheers,
Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: t.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9073 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20121026/6f7eceae/attachment.obj>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list