[llvm-commits] Fix internalize in the case where no symbols are needed

Rafael EspĂ­ndola rafael.espindola at gmail.com
Fri Oct 26 06:02:22 PDT 2012


> while this patch looks OK to me, what do you think about removing the
> special
> role of "main"?  Is there any reason why users of this pass (eg the "opt"
> tool)
> can't just pass in "main" if they don't want "main" to be internalized?

I would *love* to do that :-)

Is the attached patch OK?

> Ciao, Duncan.

Cheers,
Rafael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: t.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 9073 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20121026/6f7eceae/attachment.obj>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list