[llvm-commits] [llvm] r166593 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/ include/llvm/Target/ lib/Target/ lib/Target/ARM/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/Hexagon/ lib/Target/MBlaze/ lib/Target/MSP430/ lib/Target/Mips/ lib/Target/NVPTX/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/Sparc/ lib/Target/X86/ lib/Target/XCore/
Nadav Rotem
nrotem at apple.com
Wed Oct 24 13:16:52 PDT 2012
>
> Why does ShuffleVector not use this call? Even if it is an over-estimate, I'll need to get the cost of a generic shuffle. Otherwise, I think this looks good.
>
I figured that at some point we'll add a new API for estimating the cost of shuffles. But I am also okay with using the current API for now.
> Thanks again,
> Hal
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list