[llvm-commits] [PATCH] LoopVectorizer

[Sameer Sahasrabuddhe]

On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:05:31 -0700
Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote:

> I attached a patch for a loop vectorizer.  The loop vectorizer
> currently supports single basic block loops, with a very simple and
> strict set of legality rules.

Should the implemented pass be called "LoopVectorizer" instead of
"LoopVectorize"? Most passes have names that indicate the respective
agent of an action rather than the action itself.

Sameer.