[llvm-commits] [PATCH 1/10] PowerPC64 definitions for ELF.h

[Adhemerval Zanella]

Ping, any comments on that or the patch itself?


On 09/24/2012 10:30 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> I checked on the test you pointed and the 'test/Object/objdump-file-header.test' calls
> llvm-objdump with argument '-f'. However this options does not seems to exist anymore.
> Any idea why?
>
>
> On 09/20/2012 07:18 PM, Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> If you want to add a test case, I think test/Object/objdump-file-header.test is the place to do it.
>>
>> -Andy
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Adhemerval Zanella
>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:46 AM
>> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH 1/10] PowerPC64 definitions for ELF.h
>>
>> On 09/17/2012 05:18 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>> After the inputs from my preiovus batch of patches for PPC64 MCJIT 
>>> support, I decided to split up them in more patches and also added more tests.
>>>
>>> This is the first patch of a set of 10: a trivial one intended to add 
>>> the
>>> PowerPC64 definition on ELF.h.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>> Ping. Anything blocking this trivial patch in particular? If so, what kind of testcases would be required to do so?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adhemerval Zanella Netto
>>   Software Engineer
>>   Linux Technology Center Brazil
>>   Toolchain / GLIBC on Power Architecture
>>   azanella at linux.vnet.ibm.com / azanella at br.ibm.com
>>   +55 61 8642-9890
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>