[llvm-commits] Sphinxify HowToSubmitABug

[Sean Silva]

> I'm ok with committing direct sphinxification of most docs. LangRef
> and others would need review.

Ok. Yeah, I was going to qualify that statement but I couldn't figure
out a way to word it that didn't hopelessly overcomplicate the
sentence (your "LangRef and others" seems to get the point across;
wish I'd thought of that). I'll probably be doing "LangRef and others"
last, and I'll probably start a thread discussing how best to make the
change. Especially for the documents that exceed 1K lines (LangRef is
~8K), a more incremental approach will be desirable.

--Sean Silva

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> Should I consider sphinxifying as "obvious" and just commit directly?
>>
>> -- Sean Silva
>
> Patch looks fine.
>
> I'm ok with committing direct sphinxification of most docs. LangRef
> and others would need review.
>
> - Michael Spencer
>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
>>> Ok to commit? I made sure not to bork the toctree this time....
>>>
>>> btw, this doc is realllly out of date. Mentions llvm-gcc. Doesn't even
>>> mention clang :(
>>>
>>> --Sean Silva