[llvm-commits] [PATCH 1/10] PowerPC64 definitions for ELF.h

[Adhemerval Zanella]

I checked on the test you pointed and the 'test/Object/objdump-file-header.test' calls
llvm-objdump with argument '-f'. However this options does not seems to exist anymore.
Any idea why?


On 09/20/2012 07:18 PM, Kaylor, Andrew wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> If you want to add a test case, I think test/Object/objdump-file-header.test is the place to do it.
>
> -Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvm-commits-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Adhemerval Zanella
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 7:46 AM
> To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> Subject: Re: [llvm-commits] [PATCH 1/10] PowerPC64 definitions for ELF.h
>
> On 09/17/2012 05:18 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> After the inputs from my preiovus batch of patches for PPC64 MCJIT 
>> support, I decided to split up them in more patches and also added more tests.
>>
>> This is the first patch of a set of 10: a trivial one intended to add 
>> the
>> PowerPC64 definition on ELF.h.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> llvm-commits mailing list
>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
> Ping. Anything blocking this trivial patch in particular? If so, what kind of testcases would be required to do so?
>
>
> --
> Adhemerval Zanella Netto
>   Software Engineer
>   Linux Technology Center Brazil
>   Toolchain / GLIBC on Power Architecture
>   azanella at linux.vnet.ibm.com / azanella at br.ibm.com
>   +55 61 8642-9890
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>


-- 
Adhemerval Zanella Netto
  Software Engineer
  Linux Technology Center Brazil
  Toolchain / GLIBC on Power Architecture
  azanella at linux.vnet.ibm.com / azanella at br.ibm.com
  +55 61 8642-9890