[llvm-commits] [llvm] r163230 - in /llvm/trunk: lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp test/CodeGen/ARM/domain-conv-vmovs.ll
Tim Northover
Tim.Northover at arm.com
Wed Sep 5 11:37:53 PDT 2012
Author: tnorthover
Date: Wed Sep 5 13:37:53 2012
New Revision: 163230
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=163230&view=rev
Log:
Strip old MachineInstrs *after* we know we can put them back.
Previous patch accidentally decided it couldn't convert a VFP to a
NEON instruction after it had already destroyed the old one. Not a
good move.
Modified:
llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp
llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/domain-conv-vmovs.ll
Modified: llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp?rev=163230&r1=163229&r2=163230&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp Wed Sep 5 13:37:53 2012
@@ -3479,9 +3479,6 @@
DstReg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
SrcReg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
- for (unsigned i = MI->getDesc().getNumOperands(); i; --i)
- MI->RemoveOperand(i-1);
-
DReg = getCorrespondingDRegAndLane(TRI, DstReg, Lane);
// If we insert both a novel <def> and an <undef> on the DReg, we break
@@ -3491,6 +3488,9 @@
if (!MI->definesRegister(DReg, TRI) && !MI->readsRegister(DReg, TRI))
break;
+ for (unsigned i = MI->getDesc().getNumOperands(); i; --i)
+ MI->RemoveOperand(i-1);
+
// Convert to %DDst = VSETLNi32 %DDst, %RSrc, Lane, 14, %noreg (; imps)
// Again DDst may be undefined at the beginning of this instruction.
MI->setDesc(get(ARM::VSETLNi32));
@@ -3512,9 +3512,6 @@
DstReg = MI->getOperand(0).getReg();
SrcReg = MI->getOperand(1).getReg();
- for (unsigned i = MI->getDesc().getNumOperands(); i; --i)
- MI->RemoveOperand(i-1);
-
unsigned DstLane = 0, SrcLane = 0, DDst, DSrc;
DDst = getCorrespondingDRegAndLane(TRI, DstReg, DstLane);
DSrc = getCorrespondingDRegAndLane(TRI, SrcReg, SrcLane);
@@ -3526,6 +3523,9 @@
if (!MI->definesRegister(DDst, TRI) && !MI->readsRegister(DDst, TRI))
break;
+ for (unsigned i = MI->getDesc().getNumOperands(); i; --i)
+ MI->RemoveOperand(i-1);
+
if (DSrc == DDst) {
// Destination can be:
// %DDst = VDUPLN32d %DDst, Lane, 14, %noreg (; implicits)
Modified: llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/domain-conv-vmovs.ll
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/domain-conv-vmovs.ll?rev=163230&r1=163229&r2=163230&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/domain-conv-vmovs.ll (original)
+++ llvm/trunk/test/CodeGen/ARM/domain-conv-vmovs.ll Wed Sep 5 13:37:53 2012
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-; RUN: llc -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mattr=+neon,+neonfp -float-abi=hard < %s | FileCheck %s
+; RUN: llc -verify-machineinstrs -mtriple=armv7-none-linux-gnueabi -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mattr=+neon,+neonfp -float-abi=hard < %s | FileCheck %s
define <2 x float> @test_vmovs_via_vext_lane0to0(float %arg, <2 x float> %in) {
; CHECK: test_vmovs_via_vext_lane0to0:
@@ -62,3 +62,23 @@
ret float %res
}
+declare float @llvm.sqrt.f32(float)
+
+declare void @bar()
+
+; This is a comp
+define float @test_ineligible(float, float %in) {
+; CHECK: test_ineligible:
+
+ %sqrt = call float @llvm.sqrt.f32(float %in)
+ %val = fadd float %sqrt, %sqrt
+
+ ; This call forces a move from a callee-saved register to the return-reg. That
+ ; move is not eligible for conversion to a d-register instructions because the
+ ; use-def chains would be messed up. Primarily a compile-test (we used to
+ ; internal fault).
+ call void @bar()
+; CHECL: bl bar
+; CHECK: vmov.f32 {{s[0-9]+}}, {{s[0-9]+}}
+ ret float %val
+}
\ No newline at end of file
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list