[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Adding v*i1 MVTs

[Villmow, Micah]

I can look into providing an updated patch to add these in Tuesday if you aren't able to reach that before hand.

Micah

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 4:31 PM
> To: Villmow, Micah
> Cc: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Heikki Kultala
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding v*i1 MVTs
> 
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 20:02:38 +0000
> "Villmow, Micah" <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hal,
> >  That sounds good. I won't be able to do any combining until next
> > Tuesday, so if you want to merge them and submit together I have no
> > issue with it.
> 
> Were you doing this, or was I? I think that based on the exchange with
> Chris and Heikki we're sticking to just adding v2i1, v4i1, v8i1 for now.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Hal
> 
> >
> > The patch itself looks fine to me.
> > Micah
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov]
> > > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 12:46 PM
> > > To: llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu; Villmow, Micah; Heikki Kultala
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Adding v*i1 MVTs
> > >
> > > Please review the attached patch which adds v*i1 MVTs. I need these
> > > for properly representing the output of vectorized selects and
> > > boolean operations on the BG/Q supercomputer (v4i1 specifically).
> > > As others have also expressed an interest in these, and in the name
> > > of limiting the number of renumbering patches, this patch adds v2i1
> > > through v64i1.
> > >
> > > Heikki, will this meet your needs as well?
> > >
> > > Micah, this patch obviously affects the same renumbering as your <2
> > > x [i8|i16]> patch. Maybe we should combine them?
> > >
> > > Thanks again,
> > > Hal
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hal Finkel
> > > Postdoctoral Appointee
> > > Leadership Computing Facility
> > > Argonne National Laboratory
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Hal Finkel
> Postdoctoral Appointee
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory