[llvm-commits] [PATCH] revise test cases without tight test parameters

Chandler Carruth chandlerc at google.com
Thu Jul 12 02:31:56 PDT 2012


This last patch is definitely fine to at least unbreak these tests on such
machines. I'll try to commit it tomorrow if someone else doesn't beat me to
it.

I'm actually wonderig if we should go with something more akin to your
first though, and start being more explicit in which feature sets are under
test where... Anyone else on the list have thoughts here?


On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Michael Liao <michael.liao at intel.com>wrote:

> The patch is simplified to only disable AVX2 feature for that tests by
> adding '-mcpu=corei7'.
>
> Yours
> - Michael
>
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:59 -0700, Michael Liao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please review the patch on revising some test cases without tight test
> > parameters. On machine with AVX2/BMI features, these tests will be with
> > AVX2/BMI enabled and fails due to different code generation.
> >
> > Yours
> > - Michael
> > _______________________________________________
> > llvm-commits mailing list
> > llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120712/a684d12f/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-commits mailing list