[llvm-commits] [Patch] Optimize integer ABS on X86
Evan Cheng
evan.cheng at apple.com
Thu Jun 7 11:07:57 PDT 2012
On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:46 AM, Manman Ren wrote:
>
> Hi Evan,
>
> PerformXorCombine was enabled only when Subtarget has BMI.
> Since now I have to check Xor for abs pattern, I enabled it for all X86 Subtargets.
>
> First, we check whether it is abs, if it is, RV will not be NULL.
> We will continue optimizations for BMI if RV is NULL and Subtarget has BMI.
Ok, I would suggest something like this to make it more obvious.
SDValue RV = performIntegerAbsCombine(N, DAG);
if (RV.getNode())
return RV;
// Try forming BMI if it's available.
if (!Subtarget->hasBMI())
return SDValue();
Evan
>
> I will add more comments in the code.
>
> Thanks for reviewing.
> Manman
>
> On Jun 6, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>
>> This part looks weird to me:
>>
>> + SDValue RV = performIntegerAbsCombine(N, DAG);
>> + if (RV.getNode() || !Subtarget->hasBMI())
>> + return RV;
>> +
>>
>> Why is the code returning RV if its Node is null just because Subtarget->hasBMI() is false? Should the subtarget feature check happen earlier? The rest of the patch looks fine to me. Please commit after you have fixed the hasBMI issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Evan
>>
>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Manman Ren <mren at apple.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Optimize generated code for integer ABS on X86:
>>> movl %edi, %ecx
>>> sarl $31, %ecx
>>> leal (%rdi,%rcx), %eax
>>> xorl %ecx, %eax
>>> ret
>>> TO
>>> movl %edi, %eax
>>> negl %eax
>>> cmovll %edi, %eax
>>> ret
>>>
>>> This reduces code size and has better performance on sandy bridge.
>>> There exists a target-independent DAG combine for integer ABS, which converts abs to sar+add+xor.
>>> For X86, I tried to match this pattern back to neg+cmov. This is implemented in PerformXorCombine.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Manman
>>>
>>> <int_abs_x86.patch>_______________________________________________
>>> llvm-commits mailing list
>>> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
>>
>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list