[llvm-commits] mips16 patch 3

[Jim Grosbach]

Won't HasMips32() return true even when compiling in mips16 mode? That is, whether the processor supports mips32 is orthogonal to which mode you're compiling for.

For example, in the ARM backend, see hasThumb2() vs. isThumb2().

-Jim

On May 18, 2012, at 6:46 PM, reed kotler wrote:

> This patch adds a predicate to existing mips32 and mips64 so that those instruction encodings can be excluded during mips16 processing.
> 
> No additional testing is needed other than to assure that there is no regression from this patch.
> <mips16_patch3.txt>_______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits