[llvm-commits] [PATCH][Support/StringRef] Add rtrim.
Chandler Carruth
chandlerc at google.com
Fri May 11 13:24:09 PDT 2012
Minor comments below. Feel free to commit once addressed (even if that is
"no").
diff --git a/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h b/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
index 76ba66e..b1f376b 100644
--- a/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
+++ b/include/llvm/ADT/StringRef.h
@@ -292,6 +292,16 @@ namespace llvm {
/// Note: O(size() + Chars.size())
size_type find_last_of(StringRef Chars, size_t From = npos) const;
+ /// find_last_not_of - Find the last character in the string that is
not
+ /// \arg C, or npos if not found.
+ size_type find_last_not_of(char C, size_t From = npos) const ;
extraneous space before the ';'.
+
+ /// find_last_not_of - Find the last character in the string that is
not in
+ /// \arg Chars, or npos if not found.
+ ///
+ /// Note: O(size() + Chars.size())
+ size_type find_last_not_of(StringRef Chars, size_t From = npos) const ;
extraneous space before the ';'.
+
/// @}
/// @name Helpful Algorithms
/// @{
@@ -480,6 +490,18 @@ namespace llvm {
return std::make_pair(slice(0, Idx), slice(Idx+1, npos));
}
+ StringRef ltrim(StringRef Chars) const {
+ return drop_front(std::min(Length, find_first_not_of(Chars)));
find_first_not_of supports a single 'char' input, but this doesn't -- any
particular reason?
Do we want to provide a whitespace trimming default argument? (I'm
ambivalent about it)
+ }
+
+ StringRef rtrim(StringRef Chars) const {
+ return drop_back(Length - std::min(Length, find_last_not_of(Chars) +
1));
+ }
+
+ StringRef trim(StringRef Chars) const {
+ return ltrim(Chars).rtrim(Chars);
+ }
+
+/// find_last_not_of - Find the last character in the string that is not in
+/// \arg Chars, or npos if not found.
+///
+/// Note: O(size() + Chars.size())
+StringRef::size_type StringRef::find_last_not_of(StringRef Chars,
+ size_t From) const {
+ std::bitset<1 << CHAR_BIT> CharBits;
+ for (size_type i = 0; i != Chars.size(); ++i)
+ CharBits.set((unsigned char)Chars[i]);
+
cache the size in a loop variable here.
+TEST(StringRefTest, Trim) {
+ StringRef Str0("hello");
+ StringRef Str1(" hello ");
+ StringRef Str2(" hello ");
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello"), Str0.rtrim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef(" hello"), Str1.rtrim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef(" hello"), Str2.rtrim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello"), Str0.ltrim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello "), Str1.ltrim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello "), Str2.ltrim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello"), Str0.trim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello"), Str1.trim(" "));
+ EXPECT_EQ(StringRef("hello"), Str2.trim(" "));
+}
+
We can do a lot better testing than this. Cases that I would find
interesting to pedantically check in the test:
""
" "
" \0 "
"\0\0"
StringRef("\0\0x\0\0").trim('\0')
.trim("aaaaa")
-Chandler
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120511/79c8f4b8/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list