[llvm-commits] PATCH: BasicBlock metadata
Ralf Karrenberg
karrenberg at cdl.uni-saarland.de
Tue May 8 03:29:28 PDT 2012
On 5/8/12 11:40 AM, Richard Osborne wrote:
> On 08/05/12 09:22, Ralf Karrenberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> please find attached a patch that adds metadata functionality to BasicBlocks.
>> It should include all that is required for full support via BitcodeReader/Writer, AsmParser/Writer, etc.
>>
>> Essentially, the patch mimics behaviour of metadata that is attached to instructions.
>>
>> The chosen syntax for block metadata is as follows:
>>
>> entry:
>> %property1 !0, %property2 !1
>> %x = fadd float %a, %b
>> ret float %x
>>
>> Looking forward to getting feedback on the patch:).
> Some general comments - why do you need special handling / caching of
> debug loc metadata? Unless the format of debug information is changed
> debug metadata will only be added to instructions and so this code is
> unnecessary. You should add some testcases to cover the new
> functionality and modify the language ref to include a description of
> basic block metadata. Finally the indentation is incorrect in a number
> of places. Please use 2 spaces for indentation and avoid tabs.
That's right, LOC metadata is not required - I will remove that.
Testcases / LangRef / indentation - will do and resubmit.
>> Cheers,
>> Ralf
>> /// hasAddressTaken - returns true if there are any uses of this basic block
>> /// other than direct branches, switches, etc. to it.
>> - bool hasAddressTaken() const { return getSubclassDataFromValue() != 0; }
>> + bool hasAddressTaken() const {
>> + return (getSubclassDataFromValue()& ~HasMetadataBit) != 0;
>> + }
> I think this will result in basic block metadata effecting
> optimizations. What would happen if you just ignored metadata here?
It will always treat a block that has metadata attached as a block whose
address has been taken, which results in a crash at a later point (don't
remember exactly where) because the address was never taken.
Thanks,
Ralf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120508/b8a8e382/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list