[llvm-commits] [PATCH] RFC: fix some problems in GeneralHash
Talin
viridia at gmail.com
Wed Feb 22 13:11:17 PST 2012
So if we're going to be using memcpy, then I guess we might as well go to a
block-based approach as Chandler suggested in the other thread. Basically
I'd have a member variable that was something like uint32_t BlockData[16]
and then logic to detect when it overflows. But that's for a future CL.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's an updated patch. I've rewritten the contentious comment, and
> re-inlined finish() and mix().
>
> Jay.
>
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20120222/13c7ba5c/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list