[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Alloca clarification in LangRef
Bill Wendling
wendling at apple.com
Thu Feb 16 00:58:29 PST 2012
Hi Matt,
I don't see anything egregiously wrong with your rewording. :-) I'll approve it unless others have any objections.
-bw
On Feb 15, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Matt Johnson wrote:
> Ping? I'm willing to let this one go if I'm the only one who didn't get
> it immediately :)
> -Matt
>
> On 02/11/2012 02:33 AM, Matt Johnson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> The attached patch clears up an ambiguity in the textual
>> description of alloca in LangRef. The "Syntax" section points out (in
>> a comment off to the side) that an alloca allocating multiple elements
>> still returns a type*, not a pointer to some newly created
>> array-of-type. I propagated this information down to the "arguments"
>> section, which previously just said "the appropriate type". I then
>> re-80-columned and made a couple minor stylistic changes to the
>> surrounding sentences.
>> Thanks!
>> -Matt
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
More information about the llvm-commits
mailing list