[llvm-commits] [PATCH] Alloca clarification in LangRef

[Bill Wendling]

Hi Matt,

I don't see anything egregiously wrong with your rewording. :-) I'll approve it unless others have any objections.

-bw

On Feb 15, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Matt Johnson wrote:

> Ping?  I'm willing to let this one go if I'm the only one who didn't get 
> it immediately :)
> -Matt
> 
> On 02/11/2012 02:33 AM, Matt Johnson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>    The attached patch clears up an ambiguity in the textual 
>> description of alloca in LangRef.  The "Syntax" section points out (in 
>> a comment off to the side) that an alloca allocating multiple elements 
>> still returns a type*, not a pointer to some newly created 
>> array-of-type.  I propagated this information down to the "arguments" 
>> section, which previously just said "the appropriate type".  I then 
>> re-80-columned and made a couple minor stylistic changes to the 
>> surrounding sentences.
>> Thanks!
>> -Matt
> _______________________________________________
> llvm-commits mailing list
> llvm-commits at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits