[llvm-commits] pr11367

[Chris Lattner]

On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Matt Pharr wrote:

> It's not a completely theoretical use case: the ispc compiler depended on the old behavior from LinkModules() ("link everything in the provided modules together, and don't be clever about skipping stuff that seems to not be used"), and the lazy linking change broke that.

Why?  Can you explain the use case?

-Chris